- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
替米沙坦治疗糖尿病合并高血压临床有效性与应用价值探究
替米沙坦治疗糖尿病合并高血压临床有效性与应用价值探究
【摘要】 目的 观察替米沙坦治疗糖尿病合并高血压的临床有效性与应用价值。方法 74例糖尿病合并高血压患者, 随机分为观察组和对照组, 各37例。对照?M患者使用氨氯地平治疗, 观察组患者采用替米沙坦治疗。对比两组患者治疗后低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)、血清总胆固醇(TC)、甘油三酯(TG)、空腹血清胰岛素(FINS)、空腹血清中血糖(FBG)以及胰岛素抵抗指数(IRI)。结果 治疗前, 两组患者LDL-C、TC、TG比较差异无统计学意义(P0.05);治疗后, 观察组患者LDL-C、TC、TG分别为(2.14±1.26)、(4.24±1.01)、(1.34±1.11)mmol/L, 均明显低于对照组的(3.95±2.67)、(4.98±1.23)、(1.89±1.13)mmol/L, 差异具有统计学意义(P0.05)。治疗后, 观察组患者FINS为(7.89±1.20)mIU/L、FBG为(6.85±0.84)mmol/L、IRI为(2.52±0.64), 均低于对照组的(12.56±0.98)mIU/L、(7.89±0.73)mmol/L、(4.35±0.94), 差异具有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论 替米沙坦用于治疗糖尿病合并高血压患者的效果较为可观, 可改善患者的血压及血脂状况, 值得推广。
【关键词】 糖尿病;高血压;替米沙坦;氨氯地平;应用价值
DOI:10.14163/j.cnki.11-5547/r.2016.32.007
【Abstract】 Objective To observe clinical efficiency and application value by telmisartan in the treatment of diabetes mellitus complicated with hypertension. Methods A total of 74 diabetes mellitus complicated with hypertension patients were randomly divided into observation group and control group, with 37 cases in each group. The control group received amlodipine for treatment, and the observation group received telmisartan instead. Comparison was made on low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), serum total cholesterol (TC), triglyceride (TG), fasting serum insulin (FINS), fasting serum blood glucose (FBG), and insulin resistance index (IRI). Results Before treatment, there was no statistically significant difference of LDL-C, TC and TG between the two groups (P0.05). After treatment, the observation group had LDL-C, TC and TG respectively as (2.14±1.26), (4.24±1.01) and (1.34±1.11) mmol/L, which were all obviously lower than (3.95±2.67), (4.98±1.23) and (1.89±1.13) mmol/L in the control group, and the difference had statistical significance (P0.05). After treatment, the observation group had FINS as (7.89±1.20) mIU/L, FBG as (6.85±0.84) mmol/L and IRI as (2.52±0.64), which were all lower than (12.56±0.98) mIU/L, (7.89±0.73) mmol/L and (4.35±0.94) in the control group, and their difference had statist
文档评论(0)