腹股沟疝传统修补术与无张力修补术疗效对比分析.docVIP

腹股沟疝传统修补术与无张力修补术疗效对比分析 　　摘要：目的 探讨腹股沟疝传统修补术与无张力修补术在治疗腹股沟疝存在的差异，并对其治疗效果进行对比分析。方法 回顾性分析我院2011年1月~2013年1月接受治疗的90例腹股沟疝患者临床资料，随机将患者分为观察组和对照组两组各45例，其中观察组采用无张力修补术，对照组采用腹股沟疝传统修补术，然后将其临床治疗效果进行分析。结果 无张力修补术在并发症、恢复活动时间、住院天数以及复发率的治疗指标上都要远远优于传统修补术（P0.05）。结论 无张力修补术在腹股沟疝的治疗上具有较好的临床效果，能够达到患者及其家属的治疗期望，减少患者的治疗痛苦。 　　关键词：腹股沟疝；传统修补术；无张力修补术；对比分析 　　Compared with the Effect of Tension Free Repair of Inguinal Hernioplasty 　　LI Xian-tai 　　(Department of Surgical ,The First Peoples Hospital of Jintang County,Chengdu 610400,Sichuan,China) 　　Abstract：ObjectiveTo investigate the inguinal hernioplasty with tension free repair of inguinal hernia in differences in treatment, and the treatment effect were analyzed. MethodsRetrospective analysis of our hospital from 2011 January to 2013 January treated 90 cases of inguinal hernia in patients with clinical data, the patients were randomly divided into the observation group and the control group two group with 45 cases in each group, patients in observation group were treated by tension free repair, the control group using traditional inguinal hernia repair, and then analyze its clinical effect. ResultsTension free hernioplasty in complications, recovery time, hospitalization and treatment index recurrence rate is much better than the traditional repair (P0.05). ConclusionTension free herniorrhaphy has good clinical effect in the treatment of inguinal hernia, to patients and their families for expectation, reduce patient pain, improve the therapeutic effect. 　　Key words：Inguinal hernia；Traditional repair；Tension-free hernia repair；Comparative analysis 　　腹股沟疝在外科上比较常见，而且治疗相对比较复杂。腹股沟疝传统修补术治疗的方法，对患者造成的创伤相对较大，复发率相对较高。近些年来无张力疝修补术在临床应用上逐渐增多，本次设计中将对腹股沟疝传统修补术和无张力修补术的治疗效果进行对比分析[1]，报道如下 　　1资料与方法 　　1.1一般资料回顾性分析我院2011年1月~2013年1月接受治疗的90例腹股沟疝患者的临床资料，其中男81例，女9例，年龄32岁~82岁，平均年龄56.2岁。53例确诊为腹股沟斜疝、27例为直疝，10例为股疝，其中合并高血压冠心病36例，脑血管疾病11例，前列腺增生15例，慢性便秘2例。将其分为观察组和对照组各45例，其中观察组患者采用无张力修补术，对照组患者采用传统修补术。两组的年龄、性别等一般资料无显著性差异，不具有统计学意义（P0.05）,数据具有可比性[12]。 　　1.2方法腹股沟疝传统修补术按外科医生