脑电图脑电地形图CT及磁共振诊断中枢神经系统感染临床分析.docVIP

脑电图脑电地形图CT及磁共振诊断中枢神经系统感染临床分析.doc

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
脑电图脑电地形图CT及磁共振诊断中枢神经系统感染临床分析

脑电图脑电地形图CT及磁共振诊断中枢神经系统感染临床分析   [摘要] 目的 探讨脑电图、脑电地形图、CT及磁共振诊断中枢神经系统感染的临床价值。方法 方便选取2014年1月―2017年6月期间在该院进行治疗的100例中枢神经感染患者作为该次研究对象观察组,对患者行脑电图、脑电地形图、CT以及磁共振诊断,并且同期抽取80例患者作为对照组,对比分析两组患者的检测诊断结果。结果 观察组患者行磁共振检测阳性率为98.00%、脑电地形图检测阳性率为90.00%、脑电图检测阳性率为85.00%、CT检测阳性率为56.00%,检测成效明显高于对照组患者的检测率,两组差异有统计学意义(P0.05);观察组患者中使用磁共振诊断、脑电地形图诊断以及脑电图的诊断阳性率,均明显高于CT诊断成效;观察组患者的脑电图诊断、脑电地形图诊断以及CT诊断和磁共振诊断阳性率均明显的高于后期,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论 通过对中枢神经系统感染患者行脑电图、脑电地形图、CT及磁共振诊断,均具有显著治疗成效,脑电图以及脑电地形图还有磁共振检查,对于中枢神经系统感染患者的早期病症诊断以及患者的具体病情严重程度,以及后期的诊疗成效,均明显优于脑电图或者脑电地形图和CT诊断方法。   [关键词] 脑电图;脑电地形图;CT;磁共振;中枢神经系统感染   [中图分类号] R741 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1674-0742(2018)01(b)-0184-03   [Abstract] Objective To study the clinical analysis of electroencephalogram, electroencephalotopogram, CT and magnetic resonance in diagnosis of central nervous system infection. Methods 100 cases of patients with central nervous system infection treated in our hospital from January 2014 to June 2017 were convenient selected as the observation group, and for electroencephalogram, electroencephalotopogram, CT and magnetic resonance, and 80 cases of patients at the same period were selected as the control group, and the diagnosis results were compared between the two groups. Results The positive rates of magnetic resonance positive, electroencephalogram, electroencephalotopogram and CT in the observation group were respectively 98.00%, 90.00%, 85.00%, 56.00%, and the test effect was obviously higher than that in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant(P0.05), and the positive rates of electroencephalogram, electroencephalotopogram, and magnetic resonance were obviously higher than that of CT, and the positive rates of electroencephalogram, electroencephalotopogram, CT and magnetic resonance were obviously higher than that in the latter stage, and the difference was statistically srynificant(P0.05). Conclusion The effect of electroencephalogram, electroencephalotopogram, CT and magnetic resonance in diagnosis of central

文档评论(0)

189****7685 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档