- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
腹腔镜下大径线子宫肌瘤剔除术临床观察
腹腔镜下大径线子宫肌瘤剔除术临床观察
【摘要】 目的:探讨腹腔镜下大径线子宫肌瘤剔除术的临床疗效、安全性及可行性,进一步指导临床提供依据。方法:回顾性分析本院2013年1月-2014年10月住院收治的行腹腔镜下大径线子宫肌瘤剔除术患者119例作为观察组,同期住院收治的行传统开腹手术下大径线子宫肌瘤剔除术患者112例作为对照组,对两组患者术前、术后的临床资料进行分析,观察两组患者手术情况、术后疼痛程度情况及并发症情况进行对比分析。结果:观察组的手术时间、术中出血量与对照组比较差异无统计学意义(P0.05);观察组肛门排气时间、术后镇痛药使用情况以及住院时间明显优于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P0.05);观察组术后疼痛程度明显低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P0.05);两组并发症发生情况比较差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论:腹腔镜下行大径线子宫肌瘤剔除术是一种安全可行的微创手术方法,临床疗效显著,具有术后恢复快,并发症少等优点,值得临床借鉴。
【关键词】 子宫肌瘤剔除术; 腹腔镜手术; 大径线; 临床观察
The Clinical Observation of Laparoscopic Large Diameter Line Uterine Fibroids Eliminate Intraoperative/LI Qian,QUAN Xiao-guang,ZHOU Mei-juan.//Medical Innovation of China,2015,12(15):023-025
【Abstract】 Objective:To explore the clinical effect,safety and feasibility of large diameter line uterine fibroids rejecting operation under laparoscopic, further to provides the basis to guide clinical.Method:the clinical date before and after the operation of the 231 patients from January 2013 to October 2014 in our hospital were retrospective analyzed, 119 patients with large diameter line uterine fibroids rejecting operation under laparoscopic as observation group, 112 patients with large diameter line uterine fibroids rejecting operation under traditional open surgery as control group.the operation conditions, degree of postoperative pain and complications of the patients were analyzed and compared.Result:The operation time and intraoperative blood loss of the two groups had no significant differences (P0.05).The anal exhaust time, using of analgesic, and postoperative hospitalization time of the observation group was better than that of the control group, the values between the two groups were statistically significant (P0.05).Postoperative pain degree of observation group was obviously lower than the control group, the result was statistically significant (P0.05).The complications of the two groups had significant differences, it was statistically significant (P0.05).Conclusion:Laparoscopic myomectomy for l
文档评论(0)