连续性肾脏替代在治疗严重脓毒血症中效果评价.docVIP

连续性肾脏替代在治疗严重脓毒血症中效果评价.doc

此“医疗卫生”领域文档为创作者个人分享资料,不作为权威性指导和指引,仅供参考
  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
连续性肾脏替代在治疗严重脓毒血症中效果评价

连续性肾脏替代在治疗严重脓毒血症中效果评价   [摘要]目的 通过观察严重脓毒血症患者连续性肾脏替代治疗的临床效果,分析连续性肾脏替代治疗严重脓毒血症的可行性。方法 选取2015年3月~2016年3月在我院接受连续性肾脏替代治疗的严重脓毒血症患者13例作为观察组,选取同期未进行连续性肾脏替代治疗而接受常规治疗的严重脓毒血症的患者13例作为对照组,记录两组患者治疗前后的临床数据包括乳酸、降钙素原、尿量等的变化情况,比较两组患者的治疗效果和病死率情况。结果 对比观察组和对照组患者的疾病严重程度(APCHEⅡ评分)和器官衰竭水平(SOFA评分),两者的差异无统计学意义(P0.05);对比两组患者短期内乳酸、降钙素原的下降及尿量恢复情况,观察组均明显优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P0.05);急性期(7 d)病死率为7.69%,与对照组(38.46%)相比较显著降低,两者差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论 连续性肾脏替代治疗可提高严重脓毒血症患者急性期抢救成功率,具有一定的可行性,可以在临床上推广应用。   [关键词]连续性肾脏替代治疗;严重脓毒血症;急性肾功能损伤   [中图分类号] R459 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1674-4721(2017)05(b)-0037-03   Feasibility analysis of continuous renal replacement therapy for severe sepsis   OU Yuan WANG Ling   ICU,Heavy Steel General Hospital,Chongqing 400080,China   [Abstract]Objective By observing the clinical effect of continuous renal replacement therapy in patients with severe sepsis to analysis the feasibility of continuous renal replacement for severe sepsis.Methods 13 patients with severe sepsis who received continuous renal replacement therapy in our hospital from March 2015 to March 2016 were selected as observation group,13 patients with severe sepsis who had undergone continuous renal replacement therapy without conventional therapy were selected as the control group,the clinical data of the two groups were recorded before and after treatment,including lactic acid, procalcitonin,oxygenation index, urine output and so on,to compare the treatment and mortality of two groups.Results There was a significant difference between the two groups in the severity of disease (APCHE Ⅱ score) and organ failure (SOFA score),the difference was not statistically significant (P0.05);Comparison of the two groups of patients in the short term lactate, procalcitonin decreased, increased oxygenation index and urine recovery,the observation group was significantly better,their difference was statistically significant (P0.05);The mortality rate in the acute phase (7 days) was 7.69%,and significantly decreased compared with the control g

文档评论(0)

130****9768 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档