连续性血液净化治疗脓毒症效果及临床应用优势分析.docVIP

连续性血液净化治疗脓毒症效果及临床应用优势分析.doc

此“医疗卫生”领域文档为创作者个人分享资料,不作为权威性指导和指引,仅供参考
  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
连续性血液净化治疗脓毒症效果及临床应用优势分析

连续性血液净化治疗脓毒症效果及临床应用优势分析   [摘要]目的 探讨连续性血液净化治疗脓毒症的效果。方法 选取2012年1月~2015年12月我院收治的100例脓毒症患者作为研究对象,采用随机数字表法分为对照组和观察组,各50例。对照组实施常规治疗,观察组在常规治疗的基础上实施连续性血液净化治疗。比较两组的住院时间、机械通气时间、ICU滞留时间、28 d内死亡率,记录两组治疗前后的急性生理与慢性健康评分(APACHE Ⅱ)及炎症因子指标。结果 观察组的住院时间、机械通气时间、ICU滞留时间显著短于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P0.01)。观察组的死亡率显著低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。两组治疗后的APACHE Ⅱ评分及TNF-α、IL-6、hs-CRP水平显著低于治疗前,差异有统计学意义(P0.01)。观察组治疗后的APACHEⅡ评分及TNF-α、IL-6、hs-CRP水平显著低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P0.01)。结论 采用连续性血液净化治疗脓毒症患者具有显著的临床效果,可有效缩短患者的治疗时间,降低死亡率,改善患者的急性生理功能和慢性健康状态。   [关键词]脓毒症;连续性血液净化;临床应用   [中图分类号] R459.5 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1674-4721(2016)10(b)-0032-04   [Abstract]Objective To explore the efficacy of continuous blood purification in the treatment of sepsis.Methods 100 cases of sepsis from January 2012 to December 2015 in our hospital were selected as the study subject,the patients were divided into the control group and the observation group by using the digital random table method,each group had 50 cases.The control group was given routine treatment,and the observation group was treated with continuous blood purification on the basis of routine treatment.The hospital time,mechanical ventilation time,ICU retention time,28 days mortality was compared between the two groups,and the acute physiology and chronic health evaluation Ⅱ score,the indexes of inflammatory factor before and after treatment were recorded between the two groups.Results The hospital time,mechanical ventilation time,ICU retention time in the observation group was shorter than that in the control group,with significant difference (P0.01).The mortality in the observation group was lower than that in the control group,with significant difference (P0.05).The score of APACHE Ⅱ and the level of TNF-α,IL-6,hs-CRP in the two groups after treatment was lower than that before treatment,with significant difference (P0.01).The score of APACHE Ⅱ and the level of TNF-α,IL-6,hs-CRP in the observation group after treatment was lower than that in the control group,with significant difference

文档评论(0)

130****9768 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档