- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
连续舒适护理对老年髋部骨折术后患者影响
连续舒适护理对老年髋部骨折术后患者影响
[摘要] 目的 探讨连续舒适护理对老年髋部骨折术后患者的影响。 方法 选取哈尔滨医科大学附属第一医院2013年8月~2015年8月收治的90例老年髋部骨折患者,采取随机数字表法分为对照组与观察组,每组各45例。对照组仅给予常规护理,观察组在对照组基础上给予连续舒适护理,对比两组患者Harris髋关节评分、Barthel指数评分、焦虑自评量表(SAS)评分、抑郁自评量表(SDS)评分、护理满意度。 结果 两组患者护理前Hariss髋关节评分及Barthel指数评分比较差异无统计学意义(P 0.05)。两组患者护理后Hariss髋关节评分及Barthel指数评分较护理前升高,观察组较对照组升高更加显著(P 0.05)。两组患者护理后SAS及SDS评分较护理前降低,观察组较对照组降低更加显著(P 0.05)。对照组的护理满意度为68.89%,观察组的护理满意度为93.33%,差异有统计学意义(P 0.05)。 结论 连续舒适护理应用于老年髋关节骨折术后的临床工作中具有显著效果,可提高Hariss髋关节评分、Barthel指数评分,降低SAS评分、SDS评分,提升患者对护理人员的满意度。
[关键词] 连续舒适护理;老年髋部骨折;焦虑状态;抑郁状态
[中图分类号] R473.6 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1673-7210(2016)03(b)-0158-04
[Abstract] Objective To explore influnce of continuous comfortable nursing on elderly patients with hip fracture surgery. Methods 90 elderly patients with hip fracture in the First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University from August 2013 to August 2015 were selected and divided into control group and observation group by taking random number table method, there were 45 cases in each group. Control group was given routine nursing only, observation group was given continuous comfortable nursing on the basis of control group. Hariss hip score, Barthel index score, SAS score and SDS score, nursing satisfaction between two groups were compared. Results Before nursing, Hariss hip score and Barthel index score between two groups had no significant differences (P 0.05). Hariss score and the Barthel index score in two groups after nursing were higher than before nursing, observation group increased more significantly than control group (P 0.05). SAS score and SDS score in two groups after nursing were lower than before nursing, observation group decreased more significantly than control group (P 0.05). Nursing satisfaction of control group was 68.89%, nursing satisfaction of observation group was 93.33%, with significant difference (P 0.05). Conclusion Continuous comfortable nursing applied in elderly hip fracture in clinical work has a significant
文档评论(0)