集中内观疗法对酒依赖患者内隐认知偏倚影响.docVIP

集中内观疗法对酒依赖患者内隐认知偏倚影响.doc

此“医疗卫生”领域文档为创作者个人分享资料,不作为权威性指导和指引,仅供参考
  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
集中内观疗法对酒依赖患者内隐认知偏倚影响

集中内观疗法对酒依赖患者内隐认知偏倚影响   [摘要] 目的 探?go/no-go内隐关联试验(GNAT)评价集中内观疗法对酒依赖患者内隐认知偏倚的影响。 方法 选择2013年10月~2015年12月在南京医科大学附属无锡市精神卫生中心接受治疗的符合酒精依赖诊断标准的28例患者作为研究组,选择与研究组性别、年龄以及文化程度相匹配的28名健康者作为对照组。研究组予集中内观治疗4周。采用GNAT对治疗前后两组刺激的正确率、反应时及错误率进行测量和比较。 结果 试验1与试验2中,对照组治疗前后反应时、正确率以及错误率比较,差异均无统计学意义(P 0.05)。治疗前,试验1研究组反应时短于对照组,正确率高于对照组,而错误率低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P 0.05)。试验2研究组反应时长于对照组,正确率低于对照组,而错误率高于对照组(P 0.05)。治疗后,研究组试验1反应时长于治疗前,正确率低于治疗前,而错误率高于治疗前(P 0.05);治疗后试验2反应时长于治疗前,正确率高于治疗前,而错误率低于治疗前(P 0.05)。 结论 集中内观疗法能够改善酒依赖患者内隐认知偏倚,对预防复饮具有重要的治疗价值。   [关键词] Go/No-go内隐关联试验;内隐认知;集中内观疗法;酒依赖   [中图分类号] R749.62 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1673-7210(2017)12(b)-0121-04   [Abstract] Objective To investgate the effect of concentrated Naikan therapy on implicit cognition bias in Alcohol dependent patients using go/no-go association task (GNAT). Methods From October 2013 to December 2015, 28 patients met the criteria of alcohol dependence were enrolled as research group and matched sexual, age and education degree of 28 healthy persons were enrolled as control group. The research group was treated with concentrated Naikan therapy for 4 weeks. The right rate, response time and false rate were measured and compared by GNAT between the two groups. Results In the control group, there were no significant differences in right rate, response time and false rate between before and after treatment in test 1 and test 2 (P 0.05). Before treatment, in the research group test 1, the response time was shorter, the right rate was higher and the false rate was lower than those of control group, with statistically significant differences (P 0.05); in the research group test 2, the response time was longer, the right rate was lower and the false rate was higher than those of control group, with statistically significant differences (P 0.05). After treatment, in the research group test 1, the response time was longer, the right rate was lower and the false rate was higher than those of before treatment, with statistically significant differenc

文档评论(0)

130****9768 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档