重型颅脑外伤术后脑梗死发生预防性治疗分析.docVIP

重型颅脑外伤术后脑梗死发生预防性治疗分析.doc

此“医疗卫生”领域文档为创作者个人分享资料,不作为权威性指导和指引,仅供参考
  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
重型颅脑外伤术后脑梗死发生预防性治疗分析

重型颅脑外伤术后脑梗死发生预防性治疗分析   [摘要] 目的 探究预防重型颅脑损伤患者手术后脑梗死的治疗方法。方法 方便选取2011年1月―2017年4月进入该院采用去骨瓣减压术治疗的重型颅脑损伤患者共102例患者,对患者术后收缩压进行测量,根据收缩压(SBP)的差异分为3组,A组患者的收缩压小于15 mmHg,B组患者的收缩压在151~180 mmHg之间,C组患者收缩压大于180 mmHg,3组患者手术后均给予血管扩张治疗以及缩水治疗,比较3组患者的治疗效果。结果 A组与C组脑梗死的发生率分别为52.9%与50.0%显著的高于B组17.6%,差异有统计学意义(P0.05);B组GCS评分与A、C两组相比差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论 在治疗重型颅脑损伤患者时要控制患者的收缩压在150~180 mmHg之间,能够有效控制患者术后脑梗死的发生,对于提高患者治疗效果具有重要意义。   [关键词] 重型颅脑损伤;脑梗死;预防性治疗   [中图分类号] R587 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1674-0742(2017)09(c)-0125-03   Analysis of Preventive Treatment of Occurrence of Cerebral Infraction after the Severe Craniocerebral Trauma Surgery   ZHANG Song   Department of Neurosurgery, Donghai People’s Hospital, Lianyungang, Jiangsu Province, 222300 China   [Abstract] Objective To study the treatment method of cerebral infraction after the severe craniocerebral trauma surgery. Methods 102 cases of patients with severe craniocerebral trauma after the decompressive craniectomy in our hospital from January 2011 to April 2017 were convenient selected and the postoperative systolic pressure was measured and the patients were divided into three groups according to different SBP, including the group A whose systolic pressure 180 mmHg, and the three groups were treated with hemangiectasis and shrink after operation, and the treatment effect was compared between the three groups. Results The incidence rate of cerebral infraction in the group A and in the group C was obviously higher than that in the group B, (52.9%, 50.0% vs 17.6%), and the difference was statistically significant(P0.05); the difference in the GCS score among the three groups was statistically significant(P0.05). Conclusion We should control the systolic pressure between 150~180 mm Hg in treatment of patients with severe craniocerebral trauma, which is of important significance to improving the treatment effect of patients.   [Key words] Severe craniocerebral trauma; Cerebral infraction; Preventive treatment   ?S着时代的不断发展,科技水平的飞速提高,人们生活领域的多元化导致外力

文档评论(0)

130****9768 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档