- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
预成纤维桩或可塑纤维桩在口腔修复中临床效果分析
预成纤维桩或可塑纤维桩在口腔修复中临床效果分析
[摘要] 目的 探讨预成纤维桩或可塑纤维桩在口腔修复中的临床效果。方法 从该院在2016年6月―2017年6月期间诊治的需要进行口腔修复的患者当中方便选取114例作为观察对象,对患者进行编号,1~114号,其中奇数号为对照组,给予金属桩口腔修复,偶数号为观察组,给予预成纤维桩或可塑纤维桩口腔修复(预成纤维桩27例,可塑纤维桩30例),对比两组口腔修复的临床效果。结果 对照组每颗纤维桩所需时间为(112.35±13.53)min,观察组所需时间为(68.57±11.21)min,由此可见,两组对比差异有统计学意义(t=11.234 2;P0.05);观察组治疗的成功率为96.49%,满意度为94.74%,而对照组治疗的成功率为82.46%,满意度为77.19%,两组对比差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论 预成纤维桩或可塑纤维桩在口腔修复中可以取得良好的效果,显著减轻了患者的痛苦,提高了患者的满意度,值得临床推广。
[关键词] 口腔修复;预成纤维桩;可塑纤维桩;效果
[中图分类号] R4 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1674-0742(2018)02(a)-0092-03
Clinical Analysis of Prefabricated Piles or Plastic Fiber Piles in Oral Rehabilitation
GUO Yun
Department of Stomatology, Dehong People’s Hospital, Dehong, Yunnan Province, 678400 China
[Abstract] Objective This paper tries to investigate the clinical effect of preformed in oral cavity repair the fiber pile or plasticity fiber piles. Methods 114 patients who needed oral rehabilitation in this hospital from June 2016 to June 2017 were convenient selected as the observation object, according to the patient admission number, No.1-114, odd number for the control group, to give the metal pile oral repair, even number for the observation group, giving prefabricated fiber posts or plastic fiber posts oral repair (preformed fiber posts 27 cases, plastic fiber posts 30 cases), compared the clinical effect of two groups of oral repair. Results The time required for each fiber pile in the control group was (112.35±13.53)min and that in the observation group was(68.57±11.21)min, and the difference between the two groups was statistically significan(t=11.234 2; P0.05). The success rate of the observation group was 96.49%, the satisfaction rate was 94.74%, while the success rate of the control group was 82.46%, the satisfaction rate was 77.19%. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P0.05). Conclusion Preformed fiber posts or plastic fiber posts in the oral repair can achieve good results, significantly reducing the pa
文档评论(0)