颅内压监护在急性重型颅脑损伤患者中应用价值.docVIP

颅内压监护在急性重型颅脑损伤患者中应用价值.doc

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
颅内压监护在急性重型颅脑损伤患者中应用价值

颅内压监护在急性重型颅脑损伤患者中应用价值   [摘要] 目的 探讨颅内压监护(IPM)在急性重型颅脑损伤(ASCI)患者中的应用价值。 方法 选取2015年6月~2016年10月复旦大学附属中山医院青浦分院神经外科治疗的96例ASCI患者,并按照随机数字表法分为研究组和对照组,每组各48例。对照组予以临床常规治疗,研究组则在对照组常规治疗的基础上予以IPM,根据患者监护结果予以针对性治疗。进行随访6个月,比较两组预后情况,甘露醇使用时间、甘露醇使用剂量以及住院时间,术后并发症发生情况。 结果 研究组预后情况优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P 0.05);研究组甘露醇使用时间、住院时间均明显短于对照组(P 0.05),甘露醇使用剂量明显少于对照组(P 0.05);研究组上消化道出血、电解质紊乱、肾功能损害发生率均分别明显低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P 0.05)。 结论 将IPM应用于ASCI患者的治疗可获得良好效果,此举可有效减少甘露醇使用时间以及使用剂量,同时缩短患者的住院时间,降低术后并发症的发生,存在较好的安全性,值得推广。   [关键词] 急性重型颅脑损伤;颅内压监护;格拉斯哥评分;并发症;应用效果   [中图分类号] R651.15 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1673-7210(2018)03(a)-0077-04   [Abstract] Objective To explore the application value of intracranial pressure monitoring(IPM) in patients with acute severe craniocerebral injury (ASCI). Methods From June 2015 to October 2016, 96 patients with ASCI admitted to Department of Neurosurgery of Qingpu Branch Hospital of Zhongshan Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University were selected, and divided into study group and control group by random number table, with 48cases in each group. The control group was given routine clinical treatment, the study group was given IPM on the basis of routine treatment in the control group, and targeted treatment according to the patients monitoring results. Follow-up was conducted for 6 months, the conditions of prognosis, use time of mannitol, dosage of mannitol and hospital stay, postoperative complications between two groups were compared. Results The conditions of prognosis in the study group was better than control group, the difference was statistically significant (P 0.05). The use time of mannitol and hospital stay in the study group were shorter than those of control group (P 0.05), the dosage of mannitol was lower than control group (P 0.05). The upper digestive tract hemorrhage, electrolyte disorders and renal damage rate in the study group were lower than those of control group, the difference were statistically significant (P 0.05). Conclusion IPM should be effective in the trea

文档评论(0)

3471161553 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档