对比手助腹腔镜与开腹脾切除贲门周围血管离断术对肝硬化门脉高压症治疗效果及安全性分析.docVIP

对比手助腹腔镜与开腹脾切除贲门周围血管离断术对肝硬化门脉高压症治疗效果及安全性分析.doc

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
对比手助腹腔镜与开腹脾切除贲门周围血管离断术对肝硬化门脉高压症治疗效果及安全性分析

对比手助腹腔镜与开腹脾切除贲门周围血管离断术对肝硬化门脉高压症治疗效果及安全性分析   [摘要] 目的 探讨手助腹腔镜和开腹脾切除贲门周围血管离断术对肝硬化门脉高压症治疗效果及安全性。方法 随机抽取肝硬化门脉高压症患者60例进行研究,均为2016年7月―2017年7月期间该院消化科收治,按照随机数字法分组,就开腹脾切除术联合贲门周围血管离断术治疗(对照组,n=30)与手助腹腔镜联合贲门周围血管离断术治疗(观察组,n=30)对手术操作用时等相关指标展开对比。结果 观察组患者手术操作用时为(101.41±13.12)min、术中实际出血量为(224.83±20.06)mL、术后引流量为(697.11±46.12)mL、术后肛门排气时间为(2.14±0.26)d、切口长度为(9.84±5.13)cm、禁食时间为(68.23±21.17)h、术后镇痛次数为(0.91±0.03)次、住院时长为(12.12±1.09)d,并发症发生率为6.7%,以上指标明显低于对照组(P0.05)。结论 手助腹腔镜联合贲门周围血管离断术治疗肝硬化门脉高压症效果较好,住院时间较短,并发症较少,值得临床推广应用。   [关键词] 手助腹腔镜;开腹脾切除术;贲门周围血管离断术;肝硬化;门脉高压   [中图分类号] R4 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1674-0742(2018)03(b)-0020-03   Analysis of Comparison of Effect and Safety of Hand-assisted Laparoscopy and Pericardial Devascularization Versus Open Surgery in Treatment of Portal Hypertension due to Cirrhosis   LIU Qing-hua, CHEN Ying, LI Wan-hua, WANG Ling, JIAN Ze-ying   Department of General Surgery, Pingdingshan Branch of Chongqing Public and Health Medical Treatment Center, Chongqing, 400030 China   [Abstract] Objective To study the effect and safety of hand-assisted laparoscopy and pericardial devascularization versus open surgery in treatment of portal hypertension due to cirrhosis. Methods 60 cases of patients with portal hypertension due to cirrhosis admitted and treated in our hospital from July 2016 to July 2017 were selected and randomly divided into two groups with 30 cases in each, respectively treated with hand-assisted laparoscopy and pericardial devascularization versus open surgery, and the operation time was compared between the two groups. Results The operation time, intraoperative bleeding amount, postoperative drainage amount, postoperative anus exhaust time, incision length, fasting time, postoperative analgesia frequency, length of stay, incidence rate of complications in the observation group were respectively (101.41±13.12)min, (224.83±20.06)mL, (697.11±46.12)mL, (2.14±0.26)d, (9.84±5.13)cm, (68.23±21.17)h, (0.91±0.03)times, (12.12±1.09)d, 6.7%, which were obviously lower

文档评论(0)

317960162 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档