CT和MRI增强扫描应用于原发性胰腺癌诊断中价值分析.docVIP

CT和MRI增强扫描应用于原发性胰腺癌诊断中价值分析.doc

此“医疗卫生”领域文档为创作者个人分享资料,不作为权威性指导和指引,仅供参考
  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
CT和MRI增强扫描应用于原发性胰腺癌诊断中价值分析

CT和MRI增强扫描应用于原发性胰腺癌诊断中价值分析   [摘要] 目的 探?CT与MRI增强扫描应用于原发性胰腺癌临床诊断中的价值差异,为临床应用提供参考依据。方法 回顾性分析该院2015年1月―2017年1月所收治40例胰腺癌(均经病理检查确诊)患者的CT、MRI增强扫描等影像学资料。比较其特征性成像表现差异。 结果 CT增强扫描确诊率为83.33%,与病理检查的100.0%相比较,前者确诊率稍低,差异无统计学意义(χ2=2.455,P0.05)。MRI增强扫描确诊率为87.5%,与病理检查的100.00%相比较,前者确诊率稍低,差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.533,P0.05)。CT检查示1.0 cm病灶25个,1 cm病灶27个,1.0 cm病灶22个,1 cm病灶23个,0.05)。结论 CT与MRI增强扫描应用于原发性胰腺癌临床诊断中,均具有较好的诊断价值,可靠性高;其中,MRI显示细节能力更强,CT检查更为便捷,二者应灵活运用,以提升临床诊疗水平。   [关键词] 原发性胰腺癌;CT;MRI   [中图分类号] R5 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1674-0742(2018)02(c)-0191-03   Value Analysis of CT and MRI Enhanced Scan in the Diagnosis of Primary Pancreatic Cancer   ZHANG Wei   Imaging Department, Funing People’s Hospital, Yancheng, Jiangsu Province, 224400 China   [Abstract] Objective This paper tries to analyze to explore the value difference between CT and MRI enhanced scan in the clinical diagnosis of primary pancreatic cancer, and to provide references for clinical application. Methods The imaging data of 40 cases of pancreatic cancer (all confirmed by pathological examination) in our hospital from the January of 2015 to the January of 2017 were analyzed retrospectively, such as CT, MRI enhanced scan and so on. The differences in characteristic imaging were compared. Results The diagnostic accuracy of CT enhanced scan was 83.33%. Compared with 100.00% of pathological examination, the difference was not statistically significant(χ2=2.455,P0.05). The diagnostic accuracy of MRI enhanced scan was 87.5%. Compared with 100.00% of pathological examination, but the difference was not statistically significant(χ2=0.533, P0.05). CT more than 1.0 cm showed 25 lesions, and less than 1cm showed 3 lesions , and the pathological examination showed 27 lesions more than 1cm, and 1 lesion less than 1cm . The actual error rate was 3.57%; MRI more than 1.0 cm showed 22 lesions, 2 lesions less than 1cm, and the pathological examination showed 23 lesions, and less than 1cm 1 lesion. The actual error rate was 4.17%; compared with the two

文档评论(0)

bokegood + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档