- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
小儿喉罩在基层医院普外短小手术中的应用
小儿喉罩在基层医院普外短小手术中的应用
【摘要】 目的 探讨小儿喉罩在基层医院普外短小手术中的应用效果。方法 72例小儿普外科接受手术治疗的患儿, 随机分为研究组与对照组, 各36例。对照组予以静脉麻醉, 研究组予以喉罩麻醉, 比较两组患儿麻醉效果。结果 两组患儿麻醉前(T1)平均动脉压(MAP)、心率(HR)以及血氧饱和度(SpO2)水平比较差异无统计学意义(P0.05);对照组患儿切皮时(T2)、切皮后30 min(T3)HR与MAP水平均高于本组T1时, 差异具有统计学意义(P0.05);研究组患儿T2、T3的HR与MAP水平显著低于对照组, 差异具有统计学意义(P0.05)。研究组患儿各不良反应发生率低于对照组, 差异具有统计学意义(P0.05);研究组患儿术后苏醒时间为(8.35±1.42)min, 短于对照组的(15.52±4.48)min, 差异具有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论 在基层医院小儿普外短小手术中应用喉罩麻醉具有显著效果, 操作简易, 安全性高, 值得在基层医院临床推广应用。
【关键词】 喉罩麻醉;基层医院;普外短小手术
DOI:10.14163/j.cnki.11-5547/r.2017.13.010
【Abstract】 Objective To investigate application effect by pediatric laryngeal mask in general minor surgery in primary hospital. Methods A total of 72 children patients receiving general minor surgery for treatment were randomly divided into research group and control group, with 36 cases in each group. The control group received intravenous anesthesia, and the research group received laryngeal mask anesthesia. Anesthetic effects were compared between the two groups. Results There was no statistically significant difference of mean arterial pressure (MAP), hear rate (HR) and oxygen saturation (SpO2) before anesthesia (T1) between the two groups (P0.05). The control group had higher HR and MAP levels during skin incision (T2) and in 30 min after skin incision (T3) than those at T1, and the difference had statistically significance (P0.05). The research group had obviously lower HR and MAP levels at T2 and T3 than those in the control group, and the difference had statistical significance (P0.05). The research group had lower incidence of adverse reactions than the control group, and the difference had statistical significance (P0.05). The research group had shorter postoperative recovery time as (8.35±1.42) min than (15.52±4.48) min in the control group, and the difference had statistical significance (P0.05). Conclusion Implement of laryngeal mask anesthesia in general minor surgery in primary hospital shows excellent effect, along with eas
原创力文档


文档评论(0)