- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
《国家学生体质健康标准》测评的公平性与有效性
摘 要:在我国,《国家学生体质健康标准》测试正扮演着“高利害测验项目”的角色。国家,各级教育、体育行政部门,学校,校长,教师,学生等作为测试的利害相关者,其利害性却不一致。从利害所指对象与利害性来看,测试结果对于学生本人而言是“个体的利害”,表现为“无关紧要”;对于学校、校长、教师而言是“团体的利害”,表现为“隔靴挠痒”;而对于国家、社会而言则是“社会的利害”,测试结果对国家、社会而言意义重大,其利害性也最为重要。当前,测试仍存在公平性与有效性问题。其公平性问题主要表现在“以形式的平等掩盖了事实上的不平等”以及以教育结果公平表征教育公平等两个方面。测试的有效性问题则主要表现为测试分数的可信度、测试者的内部信度、测量工具与测量结果之间的可信度问题。
关 键 词:学校体育;国家学生体质健康标准;高利害测验项目;体质健康标准测评
中图分类号:G807 文献标志码:A 文章编号:1006-7116(2015)04-0089-06
A study of the fairness and effectiveness of evaluation by
National Student Physical Health Standard
――Based on inspirations from American High Stakes Test Items
LI Zhong-tang1,2,YAN Zhi-li2,ZHANG Lei2
(1.School of Physical Education,Mudanjiang Normal Uinversity,Mudanjiang 157012,China;
2.School of Physical Education and Health,East China Normal University,Shanghai 200241,China)
Abstract: In China, the testing by National Student Physical Health Standard is playing the role of “High Stakes Test Items”. The nature of interests of the state, education and sport administration department at various levels, schools, school principals, teachers and students as interest related parties in the testing, is inconsistent. From the perspective of objects targeted by interests and nature of interests, as for a student, the test results are “individual interests”, showing the “insignificant” nature of interests; as for a school, a school principal or a teacher, the test results are “collective interests”, showing the “remotely relevant” nature of interests; as for the state or society, the test results are “social interests”, significant for the state and society, their nature of interests is the most important. There are still some fairness and effectiveness problems with the testing right now. Fairness problems with the testing mainly show in two aspects: formal equality covers up factual inequality; education result fairness represents education fairness. Effectiveness problems with the testing mainly show in such
文档评论(0)