乳腺癌患者心理问题及护理对策剖析.docVIP

乳腺癌患者心理问题及护理对策剖析.doc

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
乳腺癌患者心理问题及护理对策剖析

乳腺癌患者心理问题及护理对策剖析   [摘要]目的 探?乳腺癌患者心理状态及护理对策分析。方法 回顾性分析2014年7月~2015年7月我院收治的60例乳腺癌患者的临床资料,根据患者给予的护理措施不同,将患者分为干预组和对照组,每组各30例。对照组患者给予常规护理,干预组在常规护理的基础上,给予舒适护理干预。入院时及出院当天采用Zung氏抑郁自评量表(SDS)、焦虑自评量表(SAS)对患者的抑郁、焦虑程度进行评估;利用癌症治疗功能评价系统(FACT-B)评定患者的生命质量;比较两组患者对护理工作的满意度。结果 护理干预前两组患者的SDS、SAS评分比较,差异无统计学意义(P0.05);护理干预后两组患者SDS、SAS评分均较护理前降低,且干预组明显低于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P0.05)。护理干预后干预组患者FACT-B各项评分及总分均明显高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。干预组的护理满意程度明显高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论 有效地进行舒适护理干预,可以改善乳腺癌患者焦虑、抑郁等负性心理状态,从心理、社会、疾病等方面作出护理诊断与干预,有助于提高患者的生活质量,促进患者的恢复,提高护理满意度。   [关键词]乳腺癌;护理干预;焦虑;抑郁;生命质量   [中图分类号] R737.9 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1674-4721(2016)12(c)-0176-04   Psychological problems and nursing countermeasures of patients with breast cancer   HUANG Shi-fang   Department of Nursing,the People′s Hospital of Jiawang District of Xuzhou City,Jiangsu Province,Xuzhou 221011,China   [Abstract]Objective To investigate the psychological state and nursing counter measures of patients with breast cancer.Methods Clinical data of 60 patients with breast cancer treated in our hospital from July 2014 to July 2015 were retrospectively analyzed.Patients were divided into intervention group and control group by the different nursing measures,each of 30 cases.Patients in the control group were given the routine care;the intervention group was given comfort nursing intervention measures on the basis of routine nursing.SDS and SAS were used to assess the level of depression and anxiety in patients at the time of admission and discharge.FACT-B was used to evaluate the quality of life of patients;nursing satisfaction was compared between the two groups.Results Scores of SDS and SAS of the two groups before nursing intervention had no significant difference (P0.05).After nursing intervention,the scores of SDS and SAS of patients in the two groups were decreased significantly compared with before nursing intervention,and the intervention group was significantly lower than that of the control group,the differences were statistically signi

文档评论(0)

erterye + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档