- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
高频电刀联合中药熏洗治疗肛门尖锐湿疣的的疗效观察
高频电刀联合中药熏洗治疗肛门尖锐湿疣的的疗效观察
【摘要】目的:观察中药熏洗对肛门尖锐湿疣术后创面愈合及复发率的影响。方法:将2012年1月至2014年3月于我院60例实施高频电刀术的病例随机分成两组,对照组30例采取短程干扰素用药,观察组30例在此基础上外用中药熏洗,观察两组术后创面愈合情况及一个疗程结束时的复发率等指标。结果:观察组创面愈合总有效率明显优于对照组(P0.01);观察组平均创面愈合时间(9.53±1.21)d与对照组(13.31±2.26)d相比较,差异存在统计学意义(t=8.08, P0.01);两组第一个疗程结束时原皮损处、边缘、其他部位均有复发,但观察组的复发率远低于对照组 (P0.01);观察组总有效率明显高于对照组(P0.01)。结论: 中药熏洗联合应用较单纯使用干扰素在肛门尖锐湿疣高频电刀切除术后创面修复及减少复发方面具有明显优势。
【关键词】肛门尖锐湿疣;外治法;高频电刀;中药熏洗
The curative effect of the high frequency electricity knife combined traditional Chinese medicine fumigation treatment on anal wartsWANG Yabo1, ZHANG Mingfeng2, FAN Yufeng3. 1. Surgery Department, Huzhou Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Huzhou 313000, Zhejiang, China; 2. Dermatology Department, Huzhou Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Huzhou 313000, Zhejiang, China; 3. Anorectal Department, Huzhou Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Huzhou 313000, Zhejiang, China
【Abstract】Objectives: To observe the postoperative wound healing and recurrence rate of anal warts patients treated by traditional Chinese medicine fumigation. Methods: There were 60 anal warts cases, which were treated by the high frequency electric knife, were divided into two groups at random. The 30 cases in control group were treated with short-range interferon medicine and 30 cases in observation group were treated with short-range interferon medicine and traditional Chinese medicine fumigation. The postoperative wound healing and recurrence rate of a course at the end of the first course were observed. Results: The total effective rate of wound healing in observation group was obviously better than control group, with statistically significant difference (P0.01). The average wound healing time of observation group (9.53±1.21) was far shorter than the control group (13.31±2.26) (t=8.08, P0.01); In the end of first course of treatment, the two groups both had relapse at the original, edge in skin lesions and other parts, but the recurrence rate in observation gr
文档评论(0)