康妇炎胶囊结合盆腔炎治疗仪治疗盆腔炎所致慢性盆腔痛临床剖析.docVIP

康妇炎胶囊结合盆腔炎治疗仪治疗盆腔炎所致慢性盆腔痛临床剖析.doc

此“医疗卫生”领域文档为创作者个人分享资料,不作为权威性指导和指引,仅供参考
  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
康妇炎胶囊结合盆腔炎治疗仪治疗盆腔炎所致慢性盆腔痛临床剖析

康妇炎胶囊结合盆腔炎治疗仪治疗盆腔炎所致慢性盆腔痛临床剖析   [摘要] 目的 对康妇炎胶囊结合盆腔炎治疗仪治疗盆腔炎所致慢性盆腔痛进行临床分析和探讨。 方法 方便选取该院2016年12月―2017年6月收治的82例盆腔炎所致慢性盆腔痛患者为对象,按照入院先后分为试验组和对照组,其中每组41例,对照组使用康妇炎胶囊进行治疗,试验组使用康妇炎胶囊结合盆腔炎治疗仪进行治疗,对两组的疗效、治疗情况、不良反应和满意度评分进行比较。 结果 试验组总体有效39例(95.12%)高于对照组33例(80.49%),差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。试验组治疗情况(疼痛缓解时间和住院天数)优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。试验组不良反应情况发生(腹痛、呕吐、头晕)优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。试验组总体满意39例(95.12%)高于对照组33例(80.49%),差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。 结论 康妇炎胶囊结合盆腔炎治疗仪治疗盆腔炎所致慢性盆腔痛疗效?@著,不良反应较少,患者较满意。   [关键词] 康妇炎胶囊;盆腔炎治疗仪;慢性盆腔痛   [中图分类号] R271 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1674-0742(2017)11(b)-0115-03   [Abstract] Objective This paper tries to discuss and analyze the Kangfuyan capsule combined with pelvic inflammation therapeutic apparatus in the treatment of pelvic inflammatory disease caused by chronic pelvic pain. Methods 82 cases of pelvic inflammatory disease caused by chronic pelvic pain treated in this hospital from December 2016 to June 2017 were convenient selected as the research objects, in accordance with the admission, they were divided into the experimental group and the control group, with 41 cases in each group, the control group used Kangfuyan capsules for treatment, the experimental group used Kangfuyan capsule combined pelvic inflammatory disease treatment instrument. The treatment efficacy, situation, adverse reactions and satisfaction scores of two groups were compared. Results The total efficacy of the experimental group was 39cases(95.12%), higher than 33cases(80.49%) in the control group, with significant difference (P0.05). The treatment situation in the experimental group (time of pain relief and hospitalization) were better than the control group, the difference was statistically significant (P0.05). The occurrence of adverse reactions of experimental group (abdominal pain, vomiting, dizziness) were fewer than the control group, the difference was significant (P0.05). The overall satisfaction in the experimental group was 39cases(95.12%), higher than that of control group group of 33cases(80.49%), wit

文档评论(0)

130****9768 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档