大学生自我伤害行为结构探索及量表编制.docVIP

大学生自我伤害行为结构探索及量表编制 关键词：自我伤害；探索性因素分析；验证性 因素分析 学界对自我伤害行为的定义还暂无共识， 国外己有学者从不同角度编制出多个自伤行为量表， 但国内相关测量研究并不多。大学生自我伤害行为量 表可用于评估大学生的心理健康水平。将涵盖典型与 非典型自我伤害行为的问卷用于调查成都、上海、西 宁的2000名大学生，经探索性及验证性因素分析发现 典型自我伤害行为可抽取两个因子它物伤和自我伤 （RMSEA： 0.065，GFI： 0.951，a 系数：0.856，重测 信度：0.785）；非典型自我伤害行为可抽取五个因子， 分别为社会规范违规、能量消耗、身体伤害、独处孤 立、感官刺激（RMSEA： 0.049, GFI： 0.949，a 系数： 0.905，重测信度：0.877）。量表内容与结构分析结果 显示该量表具有良好的信度效度。 B846 A 1009-4474 （2016） 01-0076-08 Structure Exploration and Scale Development of College Students Selfinjury Behavior YANG Yuqil, XIAO Fang2 (1.Graduate School，The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong； 2.Psychology Research and Counseling Center, Southwest Jiaotong University， Chengdu 610031，China) Key words： selfinjury； exploratory factor analysis； confirmatory factor analysis Abstract： No consensus has been achieved on the definition of selfinjury behavior (SIB) ? Scholars abroad have developed several versions of SIB scale from various perspectives, while relevant psychometric studies in Mainland China just start. The College Students Self Injury Behavior Scale can assess the mental health of students. Altogether 2000 college and universities students from Chengdu, Shanghai and Xining were surveyed with the scale including typical and atypical SIB. After conducting Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA)，data of typical SIB suggest that there are two factors： self injury with objects and self injury without using any objects (RMSEA： 0065，GFI： 0951，Cronbach Alpha coefficient： 0.856，testretest reliability： 0.785)； data of atypical SIB suggest that there are five factors： social norms violation, energy consumption, bodily injury, staying alone and isolated, and sensory stimulation （RMSEA： 0.049， GFI： 0.949， Cronbach Alpha coefficient： 0.905，testretest reliability： 0.877）. The analytic conclusions of scales content and structure indicate the scale is reliable and valid. 一、自我伤害行为 （一）自我伤害行为的定义 自我伤害行为不同程度地存在于人类行为之中， 学术界对自我伤害行为的界定还不统一（1）。国外通 常将自我伤害行为表述