非ST段抬高急性冠脉综合征介入治疗的系统评价-内科学(心血管病学)专业论文.docxVIP

  • 5
  • 0
  • 约4.33万字
  • 约 34页
  • 2018-11-28 发布于上海
  • 举报

非ST段抬高急性冠脉综合征介入治疗的系统评价-内科学(心血管病学)专业论文.docx

非ST段抬高急性冠脉综合征介入治疗的系统评价-内科学(心血管病学)专业论文

— — PAGE 1— 摘 要 非 ST 段抬高急性冠脉综合征介入治疗的系统评价 研究生:于子翔 导师:马依彤 教授 摘 要 目的:系统评价早期介入治疗对非 ST 段抬高急性冠脉综合征的有效性和安全 性。方法:计算机检索 Cochrane 图书馆(2009 年第 4 期),MEDLINE(1966~2009.9), EMBASE(1974-2009.9),中国生物医学文献数据库(1989~2009.9),中国期刊全 文数据库(1997~2009.9)和万方数据库(1989~2009.9),纳入介入治疗非 ST 段抬 高急性冠脉综合征的随机对照试验,由两名评价员独立提取资料,并对其方法学质 量进行评价。对符合纳入标准的研究用 RevMan5.0 软件进 Meta 分析。结果:排除 6 项不符合纳入标准的研究,共纳入 6 个随机对照试验,10825 例患者。Meta 分析结 果显示:早期介入治疗较保守治疗能降低非 ST 段抬高急性冠脉综合征的 6 个月全因 病死率,差异有统计学意义[RR=0.78,95%CI(0.65,0.93),P=0.006];采用敏感性 分析,早期介入治疗能明显降低致死性或非致死性心肌梗死发生率,差异有统计学 意义[RR=0.76,95%CI(0.65,0.89),P=0.0005];早期介入治疗降低因心绞痛再入 院率,差异有统计学意义[RR=0.66,95%CI(0.60,0.72),P<0.00001];出血发生 率早期介入组较高[RR=1.52,95%CI(1.10,2.10),P=0.01],差异有统计学意义; 早期介入组与保守治疗组手术相关的心肌梗死发生率高 [RR=2.07,95%CI(1.57, 2.72),P<0.00001],差异有统计学意义。结论:早期介入治疗能降低非 ST 段抬高 急性冠脉综合征的病死率和心肌梗死发生率,同时能明显缓解心绞痛症状,但存在 出血和手术相关的心肌梗死等并发症,因此需要严格把握适应症。 关键词:非 ST 段抬高心肌梗死;不稳定型心绞痛;期介入治疗;系统评价 新疆医科大学医学硕士学位论文 Benefit of Early Invasive Therapy in unstable angina and non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction: A Systematic Review Postgraduate: Yu Zi-xiang Supervisor: Prof. Ma Yi-tong Abstract Objective: To determine the benefits of an invasive compared to a conservative strategy for treating UA/NSTEMI. Methods: We searched The Cochrane Library (Issue 4. 2009), MEDLINE (1996 to September 2009), EMBASE (1974 to September 2009), CBM (1989 to 2009), CNKI (1997 to 2009), VIP (1989 to 2009). The quality of included studies was critically evaluated. Data analyses were performed with The Cochrane Collabora- tion’s Revman 5.0 software. Results: Six trials were excluded from review according to criteria. Six randomized controlled trials with total 10825 patients met the included criteria. The meta-analysis showed the incidence of all- cause mortality at follow-up was lower in the early invasive group compared with the conservative group [risk ratio (RR)=0.78, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.65 to 0.93, P=0.006]; According to Sensitivity Analysis, myocardial infarction were significantly decreased by an

您可能关注的文档

文档评论(0)

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档