- 4
- 0
- 约3.99万字
- 约 28页
- 2018-12-03 发布于江苏
- 举报
英文摘要
differencesbetweenthetwo hadno statistical
groups significamsignificance
伊=O.849).
Conclusion:
1 asblood reconstructionisa
Drug·elutingstents(DES)surgery
supply
feasiblemethodin leftmaindisease.
unprotected
the end
2·During
periodof、hospitalization,the、incidence—ofeach-singlepoint
eventssuch
ascerebrovascularaccidentinDES waslessthan
group
CABG isbetterthanCABG
group.DES
group group.
3 for
one totheresultsfrom
Follow-upyear.According death,non.fatal
myocardial vesselsreascularization,theincidenceof
infarction(MI),target
each end events
singlepoint suchascerebrovascularaccidentinDES
hadno statisticaldifference
group significant withCABG
compared
MACCEwasno difference.
group, significant
leftmain
Keywords:unprotected
coronary
coronary
intervention;coronaryarterybypass
grafting;dmg.elutingstents;
prognosis.
——————————————————————————————————————————一一——
6
英文缩写
英文缩写
英文缩写 英文全称 中文全称
leftmain
unprotected coronaryartery
ULMCA
原创力文档

文档评论(0)