公路噪声预测方法分析与评价-工程管理专业论文.docx

万方数据 万方数据 中文摘要 论文整合探究了目前国内外交通噪声预测方法的研究进展，特别选择了 FHWA 模式、交通部 2006 版规范模式以及环保部 2009 版新导则模式，针对在交 通量、车型比以及路况方面均有所差异的四条已运营的高速公路做了预先的推 定，在对真实公路样本的整体的监控测评数据的基础之上考证了 3 种模型，对这 几种模型的适用性进行了研究。本篇论文的中心研究分析思想以及成果就像下面 所述：噪声值与新建公路的车流量、车型比尤其是大型车车型比以及车速几个因 素之间存在内在联系。FHWA 模型在应用于地势平缓、较小高差的公路的有较大 的优势，并且通过对比计算发现对于较低车流量路况下的预测也更有其优势性。 交通部 2006 版规范不适合计算设计时速较低并且车流量又较大的公路，由于会 出现经由经验公式计算出的各车型的平均车速高于该公路设计时速的情况，最终 造成用该预测方法的数值会普遍偏大。环保部 2009 版新导则的适用性比较广泛， 尤其是在预测分析温度和湿度较高、高差较大，或者周围绿化覆盖率较高的公路 噪声时显示出了它的优越性。因此本篇论文中各种公路噪声预测方法的适用性分 析结果，对于今后新建公路噪声评价工程能起到一定的借鉴性作用，从而达到降 低时间成本，提高工程质量和效率的目的。 关键词：公路；预测方法；分析评价 ABSTRACT This thesis studies current status of traffic noise prediction model applied home and abroad. We compares four highways based on different automobile flux, ratio, and traffic with three special models including FHWA model, specification 2006 and the noise guideline model of version 2009. And we also compare actual test result and prediction model estimated result, trying to find adaptation for these three models. The main study shows that: there is connection between noise and some reasons such as automobile flux, ratio, speed, especial for large car flux. And FHWA fits to the road with flat terrain or small height, and also has high prediction accuracy with the lower forecast traffic volumes. And for version 2006, it does not fit to calculate a road which is designed with lower speed and large traffic. Because we find our calculated speed is higher than designed speed and finally traffic noise result is found always higher than actual condition. And Ministry Guidelines 2009 version has a widely applicability in some areas with high temperature, humidity and height difference. Also, 2009 version has a better superiority in testing a traffic noise with higher green coverage. Therefore, the analysis results of applicability of various highway noise prediction methods in this thesis can play a certain reference role for future construction of highway noise evaluation of engineering, so as to reduce t