华文作文结构标准构建分析-语言学及应用语言学专业论文.docxVIP

万方数据 万方数据 中文摘要 前人关于汉语作文结构标准的研究成果较为丰富，但科学性、一致性和可操作性存在 不足。本文在归纳、整理前人相关成果的基础上，研制出一套服务于华文作文水平测试的 华文作文结构标准，该标准包含五个一级指标，即“部件完整”“层次清楚”“顺序合理” “详略得当”“连贯衔接”五项标准；在此基础上，文章对五个一级指标进行了细化，拟 定出若干二级结构标准，并举例阐释。 为了验证本人所拟定的华文作文结构标准，我们用等距离抽样的方法，从暨南大学华 文教育研究院华文写作测试研制组全球华文作文预测试作文中抽出了90份同题华语看图 作文《今天没有考好》，由两位评分员对其做了整体评分和结构单项评分（含5个结构分）， 并运用统计学中多元回归和差异性检验的方法，对本文制定的华文作文标准进行验证。研 究发现，（1）两位评分员所评的作文整体分和结构分之间存在显著相关性，在一定程度上 证明本文制定的华文作文结构标准成立；同时发现，在五项华文作文结构标准中，“部件 完整”“顺序合理”是影响作文总分的重要因素。（2）通过对两位评分员差异性检验分析， 发现除了在“详略得当”这项标准上存在差异性外，其他四项华文结构标准均不存在差异 性，说明这一条结构标准不易把握，需要进一步研究。 关键字：华文；作文；结构标准 I Abstract Even there is abundant research results about the structure criterion of Chinese composition, they are not scientific, consistent and practical. This thesis is based on the previous study results. By concluding and consolidating the related study results, this thesis developed the structure standards that serve the Chinese Proficiency Test of Chinese writing essay. These structure standards include five level-A criteria, which are the complete structureclear hierarchy and reasonable orderdetailed slightly propercoherent. Then this thesis refined these five level-A criteria and studied out several level-B criteria. It also gave some examples to interpret. In order to verify the structure criteria of the Chinese composite given in this thesis. We used the method of equidistance sampling to get 90 composition samples from the global Chinese essay writing pre-test composition of the College of Chinese Education Research in Jinan University. All of these compositions are titled as Didnt do well in the test today. Two raters scored these compositions entirely as well as parts. The scores includes five structures. By using the method of multiple regression and differences in statistical test, this thesis verified those criteria referred in this paper. The results came as follows: (1) There was a correlation between the two scores of entire and parts given by the raters. This proved that the structure criteria referred