人民日报和泰晤士报雾霾报道比较研究新闻学专业论文.docxVIP

AbstractSimilar Abstract Similar to the¨foggy city¨in British history,China haze problems have been highlighted in recent years，which attract much attention from the media and the academia．Are there any differences between British and Chinese media haze reporting in the content and skills?How do these differences form?How to leam from it and decompose it reasonably?The paper attempts to explore those problems through the comparison of the Peoples Daily and The Times． The two main stream newspapers reveal the importance of fog issue through a large number of reports and multiple pages．On the subj ect distribution and emotional tendency，the Peoples Daily focus on fog cause¨analysis and more positive coverage，but The Times focus on haze ’’impact¨analysis and more negative reports．The Times reported many smog problems with international vision；While the Peoples Daity focused on the local，for their own service． Both the two mainstream newspapers give priority to the¨official information，but The Times value diversified sources；For the prospect of China’S haze，the Peoples Daily give the opinion that measures are effective and the outlook is positive，while The Times constructed an opposing negative picture．On the arrangement of the material，there is more¨one side¨in the Peoples Daily and much more rational¨both III 万方数据 sidesin sidesin The Times；As a result，the Peoples Daily and The Times formed narrative characteristics of¨macro abstract¨and¨micro concrete”， respectively． The main factors influencing the two mainstream newspapers differentiation mainly include：communist newspapers and liberal newspapers under the theory of media system；¨The party tube media¨ and”sink¨of management thinking；¨Collectivism¨andindividualism¨ cultural context．They influenced a variety of ways in social control and intemal control which were acceptable for the media organization． The comparison showed that the Peoples Daily fog reports exist some deviations，such as the dependence on a sin