技术标准中的专利技术的法律规制-法律·民商法专业论文.docxVIP

性和其他不具有可专利性的情况等4个条件，阐述过程中运用了中外比较研究的 性和其他不具有可专利性的情况等4个条件，阐述过程中运用了中外比较研究的 方法；接着对专利技术纳入技术标准后带来的垄断行为进行了分析，主要有联合 行、Jk垄断行为和滥用市场支配力的单方垄断行为，并分析了这两种垄断行为发生 的可能性大小；然后进一步分析了专利技术与技术标准结合后妨害了社会公共利 益，违背了技术方案的可专利性条件，最后得出了专利技术纳入技术标准后进行 法律规制的必要性的初步论点。 文章第三部分主要是从专利法和技术标准的法理角度对该课题进行深入地研 究。笔者主要从专利法的社会学和法哲学两个角度研究了专利技术纳入技术标准 后的法律规制有其合理性，其中在社会学角度谈了专利制度和社会公共利益、专 利制度是利益协调的结果两个方面；在法哲学角度谈了公平性和公益性。在技术 标准的法理方面，笔者主要研究了技术标准的本质、现状。本部分和第二部分是 文章的重点所在。 文章最后一部分对专利技术纳入技术标准后的保护进行了探讨。本部分的线 索是纳入技术标准后的专利技术是否需要保护，若不需要会产生什么后果，若需 要则如何保护的问题。本部分首先介绍了技术标准的专利技术的保护现状，然后 分析了专利技术纳入技术标准后不加以保护的后果，最后得出了专利技术纳入技 术标准后应加以保护的观点，并提出了保护的设想。 A A Study of Patentability of Paten Technology in TechnicaI Standard (Dissertation Abstract of Professional Degree of Master of Law) Speciality：Master of Law Research Direction： Civil and Commercial Law Written by：Zhang Wenjie Adivisor：Wang Limin in the process of present economical globalization，more and more enterprises and states have realized the importance of technical standard．They throw huge amount of manpower and material resources into it to regulate and extend their technology aim to gain large monopoly profits，and try to make it into the protective technical barriers for the interests of their own countries and local areas．The reason why the technical standard is SO powerful is because of the combination of the monopoly of patent technology and the universality oftechnical standard． Experts and governments，especially governments from developing countries，have taken measures successively to regulate the performance of rights on such technical standard，they reach an agreement，that is to acknowledge the patentability after patent technology is brought into technical standard．So far few people has yet opposed to this point or studied it deeply except Mr．Zhang ping，a prot’essor of Beijing based Beijing University,as far as I know．He points out that whether patentability still exists after the patent technology is technically standardized，and he thinks it needs further study． Interest