论美国专利侵权中的懈怠抗辩及其借鉴-民商法学专业论文.docxVIP

ON ON LACHES—U．S．DEFENSE oF PATENT INFIUNGEMENT ABSTRACT U．S．patent law and case law has‘deVeloped into a strict，rigorous and effectiVe legal system in the fields of law-making，law—applying， restrictions and remedies on the rights．During the 1egal litigation，the def．enses of laches，estoppel，unclean hands have acquired recognition in equity．Thisequlty．1 nls paperpaper aimsalms toto i11ustratelllustrate thethe followingfollowing cases，namelycases．namelv LaneI，ane Bodley Company v．Locke，A．C．Aukeman Company v．R．L．Chailes Constlllction Co．and Symb01 Technologies，Inc．v．Lemelson Medical， BducationResearch Foundation，Limited Partnership which are of huge importance in the deVelopment of the defense of laches to present the印plication of laches，its 1egal consequences aIld the burden of proo￡ 个l’二^ ^-^1一一一‘▲一一1 ：▲一～一一J· l nls p印er also attaches 1ts attention on Chinese law regulations in respect of limitation of patent in衔ngement and demonstrates with analysis of specific 印plications of limitation in the cases of court proceedings in patem in衔ngements and its problem exposed，which is that the patentee does not claim his right the moment he finds II L ABSTRACTin衔ngement ABSTRACT in衔ngement but wait until the in衔nger expands his inVestment in business， so that me in衔nger should bear a greater amount of tort damages． At last，the paper comes up with suggestions on Chinese reference of the pnnciple of laches as a defense of patent in衔ngemem． KEY WoRDS： defense of patem in衔ngement，laches，limitation， damages III 北京化T人学硕I：学化论义目录 北京化T人学硕I：学化论义 目录 第一章绪论 l 1．1选题背景 ．．1 1．2研究现状 ．．2 1．3具体研究内容 ．3 第二章美国懈怠制度的历史演进 5 2．1美国懈怠制度的确立 ．5 2．2美国懈怠制度的发展 ．6 2．2．1懈怠制度的法律根源及其合理性 ．7 2．2．2懈怠制度的适用要件 ．．8 2．2．3懈怠抗辩的举证责任 1l 2．2．4懈怠抗辩成立后的效力 ．12 2．3美国懈怠制度的完善 ．．12 2．3．1“潜水艇”专利概念及解决措施 ．．12 2．3．2懈怠制度对“潜水艇专利”的规制 14 第三章懈怠与权利失效及禁止反悔的差别 ．．19 3．1懈怠制度与权利失效制度的差别。 19 3．2懈怠制度与禁止反悔原则的差别 ．19 第四章我国专利侵权时效制度的局限性及对懈怠制度的借鉴 ．21 4．1我国现行的专利侵权时效制度 21 4．1．1相关法律法规对专利侵权时效制度的规定 21 4．1．2停止侵害的诉讼请求不应适用诉讼时效 ．．2l 4．1．3诉讼时效对损害赔偿数额计算的影响 ．22 4．