论人民陪审制-诉讼法学专业论文.docxVIP

摘要陪审制在清末引入我国，历经近百年，曾经辉煌一时。然而， 摘要 陪审制在清末引入我国，历经近百年，曾经辉煌一时。然而， 现今的人民陪审制呈衰微状。对此，不少学者发表了自己的见解， 但对本质性问题的探讨并不多，主张完善者也仅限于在原来基础上 的修修补补。 虽然陪审制在我国有一段为时不算短的历史，但我国的陪审制 缺少传统，没有真正树立起裁判制约等理念。人民陪审衰微的原因 有制度层面的和运作层面的，也有法理层面的。在系统论看来，人 民陪审系统内外应当协调、平衡、有序。界壳论强调加强各方面的 建设以保护系统，从而促进人民陪审系统的健康发展。从本质上看， 人民陪审衰微的症结在于：观念的错位和模式的错位。 人民陪审制究竟该存还是该废?在解答完与存废密切相关的 五个问题之后，文章接着进行利弊分析，结论是利大于弊，应当保 留并完善人民陪审制。完善的方向是陪审独立。陪审独立是相对于 法官而言的独立，是审判权的分配与制衡。陪审独立是指人民陪审 影响扩大化的状态。陪审独立要求增加人民陪审员名额。这样人民 陪审才能发挥她的优势，产生社会效应，真正成为衡量社会公平与 正义的标尺。同时，文章对建构在陪审独立原则下的陪审制度进行 了勾勒。在信息论看来，我们应当增加陪审员名额。这也是作为陪 审信宿的陪审裁决应尽量体现陪审员所具有的代表性特征的需要。 关键词：人民陪审制 利弊分析 系统论 陪审独立 AbstractThe Abstract The jury system was imported into our country in the last years of Qing Danasty．It has gone through about one hundred years，being glorious at one time．But the current people’S jury systems declining． Not a few scholars give their opinions on the issue，but they haven‘t carried out much research into essential matters，and the persons who approve of its perfection are confined to revision on the primary basis． Although the jury system has a not-SO—short history,it lacks traditions，not having established such rations as trial restriction．The cause of the declination of the people’S jury system lies in its legal system，its operation and its legal principle．From the aspect of the theory of system，there should be harmony,balance and order inside and outside the system of the people’s jury．The theory of shell emphasizes to strenghthen all kinds of construction to protect the system and to accelerate the system’S healthy development．In nature， the root cause of its declination is the idea malposition and the mode malposition． Should we reserve or annul the people’S jury system?After answering the five questions concerned，the thesis analyzed the people’S jury system’S advantages and disadvantages．The conclusion is that the advantages are more than the disadvantages．Therefore we’d reserve and perfect it．The perfecting direction is Jury Independence． Jury Independence is the