论我国取保候审制度的完善-诉讼法学专业论文.docxVIP

1 1 中文摘要 取保候审是我国刑事强制措施之一，比较于监视居住、拘留、逮捕等 强制措施，取保候审的无羁押性，充分体现了强制措施既注重保障诉讼， 亦兼顾保护犯罪嫌疑人、被告人基本权利，蕴涵诉讼效率的理念。但是， 司法实践证明，我国取保候审制度并未在诉讼中得到普遍适用，并未发挥 出其应有作用。为究其原因，本文试从我国保候审制度自身缺陷入手，着 重陈述司法实践存在的问题，并提出相应完善设想。 本文首先阐述了取保候审制度的概念、特征及其历史沿革，接着分析 我国取保候审制度在诉讼中的价值及作用，简单介绍英、美、德、日等国 家的保释制度，进而比较两者之间异同，跟着陈述我国取保候审存在的问 题，最后总结、借鉴保释制度的优秀经验，对完善我国取保候审制度提出 一些设想。 关键词：取保候审、保释、完善 1 1 Abstract In China obtaining a guarantor pending trial is a criminal coercive measure. Compared to measures like residential surveillance, detention, arrest and so on, the release on bail without detention, not only reflects the proceedings to guarantee the smooth progress of appealing activities, but also takes into account the protection of criminal suspects and the basic rights of the accused, which is the pursuit of the organic integration of criminal punishment and protection of human rights, and which should play a role in the proceedings. But practice has proved that in China the system has not been widely used, and has failed to fully play its due role. The article analyzes the existing problems of China’s System of Obtaining a Guarantor Pending Trial starting with its own shortcomings, and introduces some ideas to improve it. The article first describes the System of Obtaining a Guarantor Pending Trial by introducing its concept, characteristics, and historical evolution and then focusing on the analysis of its importance and effects in litigation process. With a brief introduction of the system in Britain, the United States, Germany, Japan and other countries and then a comparison of their similarities and differences, the article explicates the problems existing in our country and, basing on Chinas perfect Bailing System, suggests some tentative ideas for improvement. Key Words: obtaining a guarantor pending trial; bail; improving 1 1 2 2 目 录 引 言 1 第一章 取保候审制度的概述 2 第一节 取保候审的概念 2 一、取保候审的概念 2 二、取保候审的主要特征 2 第二节 取保候审制度的历史沿革 5 一、取保候审制度的历史沿革 5 二、现行的取保候审制度 6 第三节 我国取保候审制度在诉讼中的价值与作用