论民事举证时限制度.docx

introduced last the burden of proof and determine the nature of time. Time system means that the burden of proof the burden of proof obligations of the party should be prescribed by the law or court-appointed deadline to prove its claim the corresponding evidence, should bear the burden of proof overdue evidence of the legal consequences of failure of the system during a civil action. The time limits established by the proof system is mainly based upon the civil principle of good faith, aimed at the establishment of the following three points: First, the burden of proof positive to the parties, the efficiency of the proceedings; secondly, to prevent evidence of the surprise attack; Third, to fight court proceedings and evidence points to collate. As a system, its legislative provisions embodied in the certain provisions, including the following major issues: the critical point of time the burden of proof; time proof of the legal consequences of the system; proof time exceptions; and the burden of proof Related to the time limits problems. The system itself, the burden of proof there is a time limit system defects. The system is essentially the result of the parties to exclude the evidence put forward late proved right and the right. The realization of value from a legal perspective, the burden of proof time system is not always conducive to a fair and efficient implementation. From the operation of the judicial practice, the burden of proof still time operating difficulties. The burden of proof on the time of the systems operating environment of the burden of proof from the time of the litigation system institutional environment, the legal environment, political and economic environment, as well as environmental litigation concept of the four aspects. From the nature of that period is a period of proof. As a period, the nature of the problem is that during this period is a statutory, or designated period. Certain provisions of the burden of proof has made explicit