论我国的死缓新规制度.docVIP

内容摘要 死刑缓期实施(以下简称“死缓”)，是中国独创一个刑罚制度，其设定目标在于使部分罪该处死犯罪分子在含有特定情形时有条件地不被处死，所以该制度在降低处决罪犯数量上起到了关键历史性作用。 本文经过探究死缓制度渊源来考查中国死缓制度产生、存在和发展合理原因。并经过对死缓制度和缓刑区分叙述，深入说明死缓不是一个缓刑。 中国死缓制度在立法和司法实践中存在很多需要处理问题，本文揭示了死缓制度存在部分缺点并有针对性提出对应完善提议和构想，期望能为中国死缓制度发展及对死刑限制尽部分绵薄之力。 关键词：死缓 发展 缓刑 缺点 完善 目 录 序言············································································································································1 一、死缓制度概述··················································································································1 (一) 死缓制度历史发展过程·························································································1(二) 死缓制度概念、特征及其适用条件····································································3 二、死缓是不是一个缓刑·····································································································5 三、死缓制度完善·············································································································7 (一) 现行死缓制度缺点··································································································7(二) 完善死缓制度构想··································································································9 四、结论···································································································································12参考文件·································································································································14 序言 死缓制度即死刑缓期两年实施制度(以下简称“死缓”)是依附于死刑一个刑罚实施方法,也是中国独创一个刑罚制度,其设定目标在于使部分罪该处死犯罪分子在含有特定情形时有条件地不被处死,从而在总体上限制和降低死刑实际适用。实践证实,死缓制度在中国教育改造罪犯过程中,起了主动效果。同时在表现中国“慎刑少杀”刑事政策方面发挥了举足轻重作用。但死缓制度也存在着很多缺点,缺乏科学性、合理性和公平性。这使得死缓制度优越性难以充足发挥。所以，死缓制度还需深入完善。 在新历史条件下，怎样全方面认识死缓制度，有效利用死缓制度以使其发挥新历史使命，这已成为死缓制度研究关键内容。 一、死缓制度概述 死缓,即死刑缓期实施,其完整表述为“判处死刑同时宣告缓期二年实施”。中国刑法第48条要求:“对于应该判处死刑犯罪分子,假如不是必需立即实施,能够判处死刑同时宣告缓期二年实施。”死缓制度含有鲜明中国特色,是中国在刑事司法领域一大创举,在过去年代中,死缓在司法实践中取得了很好效果。 (一) 死缓制度历史发展过程 死缓制度源于中国新民主主义时期和抗日战争时期在苏区和边区曾经施行过“死刑缓刑”和“死刑保留”制度。1930年11月中共中央公布《相关苏区惩治帝国主义者措施决议》