微创经皮输尿管镜与逆行输尿管镜治疗嵌顿性输尿管.docVIP

微创经皮输尿管镜与逆行输尿管镜治疗嵌顿性输尿管 微创经皮输尿管镜与逆行输尿管镜治疗嵌顿性输尿管 微创经皮输尿管镜与逆行输尿管镜治疗嵌顿性输尿管 微创经皮输尿管镜与逆行输尿管镜治疗嵌顿性输尿管 [纲要 ] 目的 对照微创经皮输尿管镜与逆行输尿管镜 治疗两种治疗方法在治疗嵌顿性输尿管上段结石的疗效。方 法 方便选择 2013 年 1 月― 2015 年 1 月该院收治的 220 例嵌顿性输尿管上段结石患者并采纳随机数字法将其分红察看 组（ 110 例）和比较组（ 110 例），察看组患者采纳微创经皮输尿管镜治疗方法，比较组采纳逆行输尿管镜治疗方法，比 较两组患者的结石消除率。结果 治疗 1 个月后察看组的结石消除率为 100%，比较组的结石消除率为 91.14%，察看组显然高于比较组，住院花费显然低于比较组（）。结论 微创经皮输尿管镜治疗嵌顿性输尿管上段结石的结石消除率高，值得使用。 [重点词 ] 微创技术；经皮输尿管镜治疗；逆行输尿管镜 治疗 [中图分类号 ] R693+.4 [文件表记码 ] A [文章编号 ] 1674-0742（ 2016） 05（a） -0093-02 [Abstract] Objective To compare the curative effect of minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy and ureter radioparent calculus in treatment of impacted upper ureterolithiasis. Methods 220 cases of patients with impacted upper ureterolithiasis admitted and treated in our hospital from January 2013 to January 2015 were selected and randomly divided into two groups with 110 cases in each ， the observation group were treated with minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy ， the control group were treated with ureter radioparent calculus ， and the stone-free rates of the two groups were compared. Results The stone-free rate in the observation group was obviously higher than that in the control group after 1 month ，（ 100% vs 91.14%）， and the hospitalization cost in the observation group was obviously lower than that in the control group ， P0.05. onclusion The stone-free rate of minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy in treatment of impacted upper ureterolithiasis is high ， which is worth application. [Key words] Minimally invasive technique ； Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy treatment ； Ureter radioparent calculus treatment 传统的治疗方法针对输尿管上段嵌顿性结石的治疗主 要采纳的是体外冲击波碎石（ ESWL），而这类治疗方式关于 嵌立时间较长的结石成效不好且极易引起严重的并发症 [1-2] 。 跟着医疗技术的不停发展，临床对嵌顿性输尿管结石的治疗 方法也不停进行改良，为了更好地对嵌顿性输尿管结石患者 进行治疗，该院对照了对照微创经皮输尿管镜与逆行输尿管 镜治疗两种治疗方法在治疗嵌顿性输尿管上段结石的疗效， 方便选用 2013 年 1 月― 2015 年 1 月该院收治的 220 例嵌顿 性输尿管上段结石患者分别赐予不一样治疗举措，并对照两种 治疗方法的结石消除率、 住院时长和住院花费， 现报导以下。 资料与方法 1.1 一般资料 方便选择 2013 年 1 月― 2015 年 1 月该院收治的 220 例 嵌顿