_转型_时期的庄子学研究 _ 以罗根泽、侯外庐、任继愈为个案.pdfVIP

论文摘要 1949 年新中国成立直至60 年代中期，使庄子学的研究和其他社会科学领域 的研究一样，完成了从多元化研究方式到以马克思主义为主导、以唯物史观为方 法的研究方式的转型。这一时期的庄子学，呈现出在指导思想上“以马克思主义 解庄”，在具体方法上以唯物史观分析庄子思想与民国时期“疑古派”学风考订 《庄子》文本相结合的总体面貌。在总体倾向性上，以辩证唯物主义为参照系， 对庄子思想加以批判和阐释。无论其是非功过如何，都是二十世纪庄学史上不可 忽略的一页。 本文以宏观论述与个案研究相结合的方式，研讨这一“转型”时期的庄子学， 结合具体历史环境，论述其得失。全文共分四个部分，第一部分论述这一时期庄 子学的宏观风貌，第二部分以罗根泽为个案，作为“转型”前疑古学派庄子学的 代表，分析其观点、方法及对转型后的庄子学的影响；第三部分以侯外庐为个案， 作为这一时期视庄子思想为“唯心主义”的代表加以论述；第四部分以任继愈为 个案，作为该时期以庄子思想为“唯物主义”的代表加以探讨。 关键词： 庄子学 罗根泽 侯外庐 任继愈 5 Abstract The founding of new China in 1949 till 60 time metaphase, the research of Chuang-tzu and other areas of social science research, completed from the diversified research methods to the Marx doctrine is dominant, with historical materialism as a method of mode transition. During this period, Chuang-tzu, appears in the guiding ideology Marx Chuang-tzu of research , in the concrete method to the materialist conception of history of thoughts of Chuang-tzu and the period of the Republic of China doubting the ancient style of study on Chuang-tzu text combines the overall appearance. In the overall tendency, with dialectical materialism as the reference, Chuang-tzu thought to be criticism and interpretation. Whatever its merits and demerits, is twentieth Century Chuang-tzu research history can not be neglected 。 This paper discusses a case study with macroscopical and combination method, to study the transition period of Chuang-tzu research, combined with the specific historical environment, discusses its gains and losses. The full text is divided into four parts, the first part discusses this period Chuang-tzu the macroscopic features, the second part