浅谈我国的举证时限制度.docVIP

浅谈我国的举证时限制度 　　摘要：最高人民法院《关于民事诉讼证据若干问题的规定》，是自民事诉讼法实施以来首次颁布的关于民事证据的司法解释，结束了我国长期以来实行的当事人可以在诉讼中的任何阶段随时举证的历史，开始了对当事人举证期限的限制制度，实行证据适时提出主义。这对促进我国司法改革进一步向着公正和高效的方向发展提供了有利的法律保障，但这一制度所体现的程序正义以及提高诉讼效率的价值理念，在司法实践中与实现案件的实体正义发生冲突，加上《证据规定》中对举证时限的规定存在不足和缺陷，导致在司法实践中不同法院的具体的程序运作，作出不同的规定。因此，举证时限制度有待于进一步发展和完善。要通过举证时限制度由法律直接规定，设立与完善举证时限的配套制度，扩大当事人、律师的调查取证权来改善这些现实问题。 　　关键词：举证时限逾期举证答辩制度证据交换 　　Abstract: the Supreme Peoples court on the civil evidence rules of civil evidence, is about the judicial interpretation issued for the first time since the implementation of the civil procedure law, the burden of history at any stage ended Chinas long-standing practice of the parties may in the proceedings, the start of the proof limitation system, to implement timely proof-system. It provides a legal guarantee favorable to the promotion of the judicial reform of our country further toward the justice and efficiency, but the system of procedural justice and improving the efficiency of lawsuit value concept, in the judicial practice and Realization of substantive justice conflict, coupled with the rules of evidence in the provisions on the time limit for adducing evidence shortcomings and deficiencies, resulting in judicial practice, different courts specific operating procedures, make different provisions. Therefore, the proof limitation system needs further development and improvement. Through the proof limitation system by the provisions of the law, the supporting system establishment and perfection of the proof limitation, expanding the right of investigation and collecting evidence, lawyers, parties to improve these problems. 　　Keywords: limitation of adducing proof the proof overdue reply system of evidence exchange 　　中图分类号：D915.1文献标识码：A 文章编号：2095-2104（2013） 　　 　　 　　一、举证时限制度在我国的确立 　　1992年《关于适用中华人民共和国民事诉讼法若干问题的意见》第76条规定：“人民法院对当事人一时不能提交证据的，应根据具体情况，指定其在合理期限内提交。当事人在指定期限内提交确实有困难的，应在指定期限满之前，向人民法院申请延期。延长的期限由人民法院决定。”该规定首次提出当事人应在合理期限内提交证据，但对于如何确定“合理期限”以及当事人逾期提交证据会产生什么样的法律后果，这些关联性问题都没有作出规定。因此该规定还只