离职竞业禁止协议的立法选择_兼评_劳动合同法_第23条24条之规定.pdfVIP

　 广西政法管理干部学院学报 第 23 卷第 5 期 JOURNAL OF GUAN GXI ADMIN ISTRA TIV E Vol 23 No 5 2008 年 9 月 CADRE INSTITU TE OF POL ITICS AND LAW Sep 2008 Legislative Choice On the Dismission Agreement of Competition Trade Inhibition ———Comments on the Article 23 and 24of Labor Contract La w LU Xiouming 　　[ Abstract] Because of many contradictions and conflicts , the effectiveness of the dismission agreement of competition trade in hibition has been concerned and oppugned all along. After analyzing the advantages and disadvantages of dismission agreement of competition trade inhibition and considering our jud gers’diathesis remaining to be enhanced in China which is subject to the conti nental law system , the paper suggests that dismission agreement of competition trade inhibition should be regulated unitedly and roundly by referring other countries’experiences of legislation and justice , in order to guide the parties and judicial practice. 　　[ Key words] Key Word : Dismission agreement of competition trade inhibition Trade secret Agreement on secret information 离职竞业禁止协议的立法选择 ———兼评《劳动合同法》第 23 条 24 条之规定 卢修敏 (广东理工职业学院 ,广东 广州 　510091) 　　[摘 　要]离职竞业禁止协议由于涉及太多的矛盾与冲 但对其合法性和有效性的认识 ,法律界存在的差异 突 ,其效力一直受到国内外学者的关注和质疑。作者在分 极大 ,甚至观点完全相反。即便是在竞业禁止制度 析了离职竞业禁止协议性质和各国立法的基础上 ,提出中 较为发达的美国 ,其在不同的州之间 ,乃至不同的 国作为大陆法系国家 ,在当前法官素质不高的国情下 ,有必 历史发展时期 ,“受经济大环境的影响和社会整体 要在借鉴各国立法司法经验的基础上对竞业禁止协议作出 [1 ] 价值取向的冲击表现出不同的趋向” 产生这种 更加全面的规范 , 以指导当事人的行为和司法审判实践。