物的瑕疵担保责任研析.docVIP

物的瑕疵担保责任研究 摘 要 自罗马法建立以来，物的瑕疵担保责任制度已有二千多年的历史， 其对买受人的利益发挥着特殊的救济作用。然而关于物的瑕疵担保责任 的性质问题，即如何界定物的瑕疵担保责任与违约责任的关系，从其产 生之日起就一直争论不休。我国合同法也规定了买卖标的物不符合质量 要求时出卖人的责任，这是一种独立的瑕疵担保责任？还是属于违约责 任？涉及到我国未来民法典中民事责任体系的构建。 因此本文主要以物的瑕疵担保责任的性质为研究对象，通过分析大 陆法系国家以及英美法系国家中物的瑕疵担保责任的性质，进而对我国 物的瑕疵担保责任的性质进行准确、合理的界定，得出我国物的瑕疵担 保责任属于违约违约责任，不存在独立的物的瑕疵担保责任。 本文正文主要分为五章： 第一章主要介绍物的瑕疵担保责任的起源、及其基本理论，以期对 物的瑕疵担保责任有一个概念性的把握。 第二章主要介绍大陆法系国家中物的瑕疵担保责任，在阐述立法的 基础上分析了其性质，即法定责任说和债务不履行责任说，前者即物的 瑕疵担保责任独立存在，其与违约责任处于并列地位，后者即物的瑕疵 担保责任与违约责任是特殊法与普通法的关系。 第三章主要介绍英美法系国家中物的瑕疵担保责任，在阐述立法的 基础上分析其性质，即在英美法系国家中，物的瑕疵担保责任始终属于 违约责任。 第四章主要介绍我国物的瑕疵担保责任的立法概况，总结出在我国 立法上物的瑕疵担保责任是不独立的，始终属于违约责任的范畴。 第五章主要论述了我国物的瑕疵担保责任的性质，笔者首先对学界 存在的两种观点（统合说和瑕疵担保责任相对独立说）进行了分析，进 而得出我国物的瑕疵担保责任的性质，即物的瑕疵担保责任统一于违约 责任。 关键词：物的瑕疵担保责任，法定责任说，债务不履行责任说，瑕疵担 保责任相对独立说，统合说 THE RESEARCH OF WARRANTY LIABILITIES FOR DETECT IN THINGS ABSTRACT Since the Roman law was established, the warranty liabilities for detects has had more than 2000 years, the mainland legal system countries received it one after another, thus it formed a more perfect system. However this system moved towards withering away in Germany along with the German national debt law reformed in 2002 .The 1999 contract law of PRC has stipulated the buyers’ liabilities when the quality of things does not conform to the requirement , this is one kind of independent warranty liabilities for detect in things or is the responsibility of the break of the contract, this is a very important question which will involve to the construction of civil liability system in our future civil code. My conclusion is that warranty liabilities for detect has merged into the responsibility of the break of the contract in our contract law. Our contract law follows a unitary approach. “Breach of contract” is a unitary concept in Chinese contract law, and it is unnecessary to complicate the matter to admit a concurrence of adulation remedies and liabilities for break of contract in Chinese contract law theories. This article mainly uses the meth