- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
微创动力髋螺钉与传统动力髋螺钉在股骨转子间骨折患者中的应用比较
微创动力髋螺钉与传统动力髋螺钉在股骨转子间骨折患者中的应用比较
[摘要] 目的 比较微创动力髋螺钉与传统动力髋螺钉在股骨转子间骨折患者中的应用效果。 方法 选择2013年1月~2014年6月辽宁省大连市第二人民医院收治的股骨转子间骨折患者140例,按照随机数字表法分为两组,每组70例。研究组采用微创动力髋螺钉技术,对照组采用传统动力髋螺钉技术。随访患者12个月,统计两组伤口长度、手术时间、失血量、住院时间、愈合时间、愈合率、骨折复位满意率等指标,同时给予X线摄片,采用功能恢复评分评价两组的治疗效果。 结果 研究组伤口长度、手术时间、住院时间、愈合时间均短于对照组,失血量少于对照组,愈合率高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P 中国论文网 /6/view-7215459.htm
[关键词] 微创动力髋螺钉;传统动力髋螺钉;股骨转子间骨折
[中图分类号] R683.42 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1673-7210(2016)01(c)-0094-04
Application comparison of minimally invasive and conventional dynamic hip screw in patient with femoral intertrochanteric fracture
JIANG Tao GUAN Zhiyu FENG Dianpeng
Department of Orthopaedics, the Second People′s Hospital in Dalian City, Liaoning Province, Dalian 116000, China
[Abstract] Objective To compare application effect of minimally invasive and conventional dynamic hip screw in patient with femoral intertrochanteric fracture. Methods 140 patients with femoral intertrochanteric fracture from January 2013 to June 2014 in the Second People′s Hospital of Dalian City in Liaoning Province were selected and divided into two groups according to random number table method, each group had 70 cases. Minimally invasive technology of dynamic hip screw was used in study group, traditional technology of dynamic hip screw was used in control group. 12 months followed-up of patients, wound length, operation time, blood loss, hospitalization time, fracture healing time, healing rate, fracture reset satisfaction rate of two groups were counted, while X-ray radiography was given, functional recovery score was used to evaluate therapeutic effect of two groups. Results The wound length, operation time, hospitalization time, fracture healing time in study group were shorter than those in control group, blood loss in study group was less than that in control group, healing rate in study group was higher than that in control group, with statistical differences (P [Key words] Minimally invasive dynamic hip screw; Traditional dynamic hip
文档评论(0)