腹腔镜胆囊切除术中Hem―o―lok夹常规处理胆囊管及胆囊动脉的临床研究.docVIP

腹腔镜胆囊切除术中Hem―o―lok夹常规处理胆囊管及胆囊动脉的临床研究.doc

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
腹腔镜胆囊切除术中Hem―o―lok夹常规处理胆囊管及胆囊动脉的临床研究.doc

腹腔镜胆囊切除术中Hem―o―lok夹常规处理胆囊管及胆囊动脉的临床研究   【摘要】 目的:探讨Hem-o-lok夹在腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)中处理胆囊管及胆囊动脉的方法及优势。方法:选择2012年6月-2013年12月本科收治的256例择期LC患者作为研究对象,采用随机数字表法将其分成HLC组和TLC组,HLC组术中使用Hem-o-lok塑料结扎夹处理胆囊管、胆囊动脉,TLC组术中使用钛夹处理。比较两组的手术时间、术后引流量、住院时间、住院费用、术后异物不适感和对影像学检查的影响。结果:256例患者均手术成功,无中转开腹,无医源性损伤。两组住院时间及住院费用比较,差异无统计学意义(P0.05);HLC组手术时间和术后引流量少于TLC组,比较差异均有统计学意义(P0.01);HLC组术后异物不适感和影响影像学检查方面均优于TCL组,比较差异均有统计学意义(P0.01)。结论:LC中运用Hem-o-lok夹处理胆囊管及胆囊动脉,操作简单,能缩短手术时间,效果显著优于钛夹,可作为常规处理手段,有临床推广价值。   【关键词】 Hem-o-lok夹; 腹腔镜胆囊切除术; 胆囊管; 胆囊动脉; 胆囊三角   Clinical Studies of Hem-o-lok Clips in Laparoscope Cholecystectomy for the Routine Control of Cystic Duct and Cystic Artery/LI Kun-lun,CHEN Xin,LI Bo,et al.//Medical Innovation of China,2016,13(04):054-057   【Abstract】 Objective:To study the method and advantage of ligaturing the cystic duct and cystic artery by using the Hem-o-lok clips in laparoscope cholecystectomy(LC).Method:256 patients with LC in our department from June 2012 to December 2013 were selected and randomly divided into the HLC group and the TLC group.The HLC group used Hem-o-lok clips to deal with the cystic duct and cystic artery,while the TLC group used titanium clips to ligature the cystic duct and cystic artery.The operative time,postoperative drainage,hospital stays,hospitalization expenses,discomfortableness of foreign body after surgery and influence on imageological examination were compared between the two groups.Result:256 patients’ operation were successfully completed,there were no conversion to laparotomy and iatrogenic injury.The differences in hospitalization time and hospitalization expenses of the two groups were not statistically significant(P0.05).The operation time and postoperative drainage of the HLC group were less than those of the TLC group,the differences were statistically significant(P0.01).The discomfortableness of foreign body and the influence on imageological examination in the HLC group were better than those in the TCL group,the differences were statistical

文档评论(0)

sis_lxf + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档