- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
奥氮平与氟西汀联合治疗难治性抑郁的疗效探讨.doc
奥氮平与氟西汀联合治疗难治性抑郁的疗效探讨
摘要:目的:对比探讨奥氮平与氟西汀联合治疗及单独使用氟西汀治疗难治性抑郁的疗效差异,为临床治疗提供参考。 方法: 将2012年11月~2014年1月我院确诊收治的50例难治性抑郁症患者按治疗方法的不同平均分为对照组与实验组,对照组独使用氟西汀治疗(8周/疗程,30mg/天,早餐后服),实验组采取奥氮平与氟西汀联合治疗(8周/疗程、奥氮平5mg/天,睡前口服、氟西汀30mg/天,早餐后服),利用汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HADM)在治疗前后对患者进行情况评分、疗效评价。 结果: 比较分析治疗前后对照组与实验组患者情况,两组患者均有所好转,与治疗前相比,HADM评分均有所下降。治疗后1、2、4、6、8周对患者进行的HADM评分显示,实验组低于对照组,总有效率对照组为56%低于实验组的84%,Plt;0.05,差异有统计学意义。相关不良反应的发生率实验组为44%,对照组36%,Plt;0.05,差异有统计学意义。 结论: 奥氮平与氟西汀联合治疗难治性抑郁患者比单独使用氟西汀治疗的临床疗效更好,不良反应发生率较低,在氟西汀单独治疗但效果欠佳的情况下,可以采用奥氮平与氟西汀联合治疗难治性抑郁患者的方法。
关键字:奥氮平;氟西汀;难治性抑郁
Abstract : objective comparison of olanzapine and fluoxetine combination therapy and single use the curative effect of fluoxetine in the treatment of refractory depression, provide reference for clinical treatment. Method in November 2012 to January 2012 were confirmed in our 50 cases of patients with treatment-resistant depression according to the different average divided into control group and treatment group, control group treated with fluoxetine alone (/ 8 weeks treatment, 30 mg/day, after breakfast served), the experimental group treated with olanzapine and fluoxetine combined (8 weeks treatment, olanzapine 5 mg/day, before going to bed, oral fluoxetine 30 mg/day, after breakfast served), using the Hamilton depression rating scale (HADM) before and after the treatment of patients with score, curative effect evaluation. Results compared before and after treatment in patients with the control group and experimental group, two groups of patients were improved, compared with before treatment, HADM scores were decreased. After treatment 1, 2, 4, 6, 8 weeks HADM score of patients, according to the experimental group is lower than the control group, the total effective rate in the control group was 56% less than 84% of the experimental group, P lt; 0.05, the difference was statistically significant. Related to the incidence of adverse reactions to the experimental group was 44%, 36%, the control group (P lt; 0.05, the diffe
原创力文档


文档评论(0)