经尿道输尿管镜及经皮肾镜对输尿管结石患者的影响.docVIP

经尿道输尿管镜及经皮肾镜对输尿管结石患者的影响.doc

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
经尿道输尿管镜及经皮肾镜对输尿管结石患者的影响.doc

经尿道输尿管镜及经皮肾镜对输尿管结石患者的影响   【摘要】 目的:对比探讨经尿道输尿管镜及经皮肾镜在输尿管结石手术中临床应用价值以及对患者的影响。方法:回顾性分析本院泌尿外科2012年1月-2014年7月接诊治疗的120例输尿管结石患者的临床资料,随机分为试验组和对照组,试验组采用尿道输尿管镜的方法进行手术治疗,对照组采用皮肾镜的方法进行手术治疗,观察两组患者的结石清除率、不良反应、手术时间及手术费用等。结果:试验组治愈率明显高于对照组,且发生不良反应发生率也明显低于对照组,手术时间短,手术费用少,患者的恢复情况较好,但对照组的结石清除率高于试验组,而对照组的手术时间长,手术费用高,差异均具有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论:尿道输尿管镜取石术具有治愈率高、不良反应少、恢复时间短、安全性高,可有效降低严重并发症的发生率,而经皮肾镜治疗的患者结石清除率高,但手术时间长,手术费用高,因此,在手术前应针对不同患者采取相应的最佳治疗措施,以提高手术成功率。   【关键词】 尿道输尿管镜; 皮肾镜; 输尿管结石   【Abstract】 Objective:To study clinical application value and its influence of transurethral ureteroscopy and percutaneous nephroscope in ureteral calculi surgery patients.Method:A retrospective analysis of our hospital uropoiesis surgical department from January 2012 to July 2014 accepts treatment, the clinical data of 120 patients with ureteral calculi were randomly divided into experimental group and control group, experimental group of patients with urethral ureter mirror surgery method of treatment, the control group were treated by skin kidney surgery method of treatment the mirror, by observing two groups of patients with calculi clearance rate of adverse reaction operation time and operation expenses, etc.Result:Ureter mirror:the experimental group USES the urethra stone extraction for the cure rate of patients was obviously higher than that of control group, and the probability of adverse reactions are significantly lower than the control group, shorter operation time, less operation cost, the patient’s recovery was good, but the control group of stone clearance rate higher than that of the experimental group, whereas the control of operation time was long, the high cost of operation, the difference was statistically significant(P0.05).Conclusion:Ureteroscopy take urethral stone with high cure rate Less adverse reaction Recovery time is short high safety, can effectively reduce the incidence of serious complications, the patients treated with percutaneous nephroscope calculi clearance rate is high, b

文档评论(0)

ganpeid + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档