湿性愈合敷料治疗切口脂肪液化的临床研究.docVIP

湿性愈合敷料治疗切口脂肪液化的临床研究 　　[摘要] 目的 探讨湿性愈合敷料用于治疗切口脂肪液化的临床效果。 方法 随机选取本院2009年2月～2012年2月收治的腹部手术后切口脂肪液化患者120例，按治疗方案的不同将患者分为实验组与对照组，实验组患者使用湿性敷料进行治疗，对照组患者使用传统敷料进行治疗，比较两组患者治疗后疼痛指数以及换药次数、治疗时间等。 结果 实验组有效率（85.00%）明显高于对照组（40.00%），实验组患者疼痛评分[（4.95±2.28）分]明显低于对照组[（7.24±2.85）分]，实验组患者平均治疗时间[（8.55±2.25）d]、换药次数[（6.35±1.25）次]也分别低于对照组[（16.25±4.55）d、（27.35±8.65）次]，差异有统计学意义（P0.05）。 结论 湿性敷料用于治疗患者切口脂肪液化的临床效果较传统敷料有明显优势，值得临床推广。 　　[关键词] 切口脂肪液化；湿性敷料；传统敷料；治疗效果 　　[中图分类号] R656 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1674-4721（2013）07（a）-0033-02 　　Clinical study of moist healing dressings treatment of incision fat liquefaction 　　YANG Jing-yi LI Xiao-mei 　　Department of Tumor Radiology， Central Peoples Hospital of Huizhou City in Guangdong Provicne， Huizhou 516001， China 　　[Abstract] Objective To investigate and analyze the clinical efficacy of moist healing dressings for the treatment of incision fat liquefaction. Methods The information of 120 patients who had incision fat liquefaction after the abdominal surgery in our hospital from February 2009 to February 2012 were selected， and all patients were divided into experimental group and control group according to the therapeutic regimen. The experimental group used moist dressings for treatment and the control group used traditional dressings for treatment. The pain index， the number of times of dressing change and the treatment time of the two groups using different dressings were compared. Results The treatment effective rate of the experimental group （85.00%） was significantly higher than that of the control group （40.00%）； The pain score of the experimental group[ （4.95±2.28） points] was significantly lower than that of the control group [（7.24±2.85） points]； The average treatment time and the number of times of dressing change of the experimental group [（8.55±2.25） days and （6.35±1.25） times）] were lower than those of the control group [（16.25±4.55） days and （27.35±8.65） times]， the difference between two groups was statistically significant （P 0.05）. Conclus