- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
针灸结合康复技术治疗肩周炎的临床分析.doc
针灸结合康复技术治疗肩周炎的临床分析
[摘要] 目的 探讨针灸结合康复技术治疗肩周炎的临床效果。方法 方便选取该院2012年10月―2015年9月收治的73例肩周炎患者,随机分为观察组(n=40)和对照组(n=33),观察组采用针灸结合康复技术治疗,对照组采用针灸治疗,对比两组的总有效率、VAS疼痛评分。结果 观察组的总有效率为97.50%(39/40),对照组的总有效率为78.79%(26/33),观察组高于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P0.05);两组治疗后的VAS评分分别为(2.56±0.13)、(4.30±0.28),均低于治疗前的(8.01±1.87)、(7.99±1.89)分,差异具有统计学意义(P0.05);观察组治疗后的VAS评分为(2.56±0.13)分低于对照组的(4.30±0.28)分,差异具有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论 针灸结合康复技术可有效缓解患者的疼痛,改善患者的肩关节功能,疗效显著,具有较高的应用价值。
[关键词] 肩周炎;针灸;康复技术
[中图分类号] R5 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1674-0742(2016)08(c)-0178-03
Clinical Analysis of Acupuncture Combined with Rehabilitation Technique in the Treatment of Periarthritis of Shoulder
JIN Xiang-yu
Rehabilitation Department of Bone and Joint,The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou ,Henan Province,450000 China
[Abstract] Objective To observe the clinical effect of acupuncture combined with rehabilitation technique in the treatment of periarthritis of shoulder. Methods Convenient selection 73 patients with periarthritis of shoulder in our hospital from October 2012―September 2015 were selected, they were randomly divided into observation group (n=40) and control group (n=33). The observation group was treated with acupuncture combined with rehabilitation technique, and the control group was treated with acupuncture and moxibustion.We compared the total effective rate of the two groups, VAS pain score. Results The total effective rate of observation group was 97.50%(39/40), the total effective rate of control group was 78.79% (26/33), the observation group was higher than the control group, the difference was statistically significant(P 0.05); after treatment, the VAS scores of the two groups were(2.56±0.13)、(4.30±0.28)score, were lower than those before treatment (8.01±1.87)、(7.99±1.89)score, the difference was statistically significant(P 0.05); after treatment, the VAS score of the observation group was(2.56±0.13)score was lower than that of the control group(4.30±0.28)score, and the differe
文档评论(0)