论我国民事诉讼行为保全制度的建构.pdfVIP

广西政法管理干部学院学报 第19卷第2期 joURNAL 0F GUANGXI ADMINISTRATIVE Vo1．19．No．2 2004年3月 CADRE INSTITUTE 0F P0LITICS AND LAW M ar．2004 On the Construction of System For Preserving Acts of Civil Litigation JIANG Ji—cai。WEI Hong (Southwest University of Politics and Law，Chongqing 400031) [Abstract]In current civil procedural law of our country，the property preservation system is stipulated．For this system is only applicable to property，but not to acts．Such a loophole in legislation results in a great deal of fact that the parties cannot be aided by this system in practices．By reference to the preserving system in civil litigation of Taiwan regions of our country and foreign countries．this article extends from the current“maritime mandatory order“and“ interim injunction before the institution of an action which may take acts as preserving objects，further into the field of ordinary civil action，and brings acts into the scope of preservation，and then construct a system for preserving acts of civil litigation in our country，to form a dual systematic frame that lay equal stress on property preservation and act preservation． [Key words]Property preservation；act preservation；civil litigation 论破圄 事 为 舍制度的建构 蒋吉才，危 红 (西南政法大学 重庆 400031) [摘 要]我国现行的民事诉讼法规定了财产保全制度， 一 定行为，以避免因债务人的进一步作为或不作为造 由于该制度的适用对象仅仅限于财产，而不适用于行为，这 成难以挽回的经济损失。可见，行为应当也可以作为保 一 立法上的漏洞，导致实践中存在大量无法利用该制度对当 全的对象。 事人进行救济的情形。文章借鉴我国台湾地区和国外民事诉 我国民法通则第一百三十四条规定，承担民事责 讼保全制度，将我国目前实施的可以以行为做为保全对象的 任的方式之一是停止侵害。承担停止侵害民事责任必 “海事强制令”和“诉前临时禁令”，进一步扩大到一般民事诉 须在法院查明事实、确定责任、做出裁判之后进行。然