传导干燥与对流干燥的能耗与成本对比分析.pdfVIP

第 36 带第 12 期 化学工辑 Vol. 36 No.12 2∞8 年口月 CHEMICAL ENGINEERING( CHINA) Dec. 2∞8 传导干燥与对流干燥的能耗与成本对比分析 张继率 1.2 ，杨大成 2 ，赵敏网 ~2 ，刘彬娟 2 (1.闸北工业大学化工学院，天津 3∞ 130; 2. 石家庄工大化工设备有限公司，河北石家脏的∞31) 摘要:干燥作业是各行业中能耗较大的处理方法之一，我国干燥能耗约占全部工业能耗的 12%0 传导干燥比对流 干燥节能 20%-50% ，但传导设备往往耗用金属材料较多，结构较复杂，主机造价较高，用户有时会肉不能综合分 析对比，只因3::机投资较大，放弃节能产品的选用。文中利用通用的 Excel 程序，建立了一种定撞的能格提干燥戚 本综合对比分析方法，可方便迅速地对不同干燥方法定量比较，输出节能对投资的剧报率，从时优选出节能干燥设 备，对推动节能产品的应用、降低干燥成本具有 3重要意义。 提键词:节能;干燥成本;传导干燥;对流干燥 中回分提号 :TQ 05 1. 892 文献标tR 码 :A 文章编号: 1 ∞5-9954(2∞8)12研)63.03 Contrastive analysis of energy consumption and cost of indirect and direct drying 1 2 2 2 2 ZHANG Ji_jun ? , YANG Da-cheng , ZHAO Min-gang , LIU Cai-juan ( 1. School of Chemical Engineering and Technology , Hebei University of Technology , Tianjin 3∞ 130 ， China; 2. Shijiazhuang Gongda Chemical Engineering Equipment Co. , Ltd. , Shijiazhuang 05ω131 , Hebei Province , China) Abstract: As a high-energy 嗣 consumption treatment process , drying operation accounts for 12% of the energy consumption in all industries of China. The indirect drying can save energy 20%δ0% compared with the direct drying , however the indirect drγing 叫uipment h制 some shortcomings , such 拙 more metal materials consumed , complicated structure and higher cost of 叫uipment. Without a comprehensive contrast , the customer may abandon the adoptíon of energy saving product just because of íts higher price. A conlrastive analy白is method for quanti班 cational energy consumption and drying cost w拙 establishe