Replication-based do not say - UFIDA flaw.docVIP

 PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 6 Replication-based do not say - UFIDA flaw Customer demand on the market are personalized, which is a trend. And customers personalized needs require the implementation of IT enterprise client. But the customer care side of the execution of IT enterprises, the difficulty and cost of its implementation is a limited business development and growth factors. Like all major IT vendors for large-scale and personalized solutions are a wide range of large-scale up to achieve a limited personalization. Like Kingdee’s ‘ERP middleware’ and UF’s ‘standard parts industry development,’ and so on. IT enterprises in the model can be a good solution to scale and personalized the conflict to achieve a certain degree of replicated results, is welcome. However, the question is: in the realization of the large-scale promotion of the circumstances, whether or not to widely publicize the scale of business strategy? Our domestic IT companies have forgotten what the customer needs, customer needs are always personalized, such as UF ERP companies engaged in the popularization tour around the publicity, but also used in the Ford Model T’s example, and the advantages of universal suffrage. It seems to the writer, this is undoubtedly one of the largest flaw. The customer view, they need is a personalized product and service is the best, and the popularization of the product in their eyes, is undoubtedly the low-end performance. Conducted by UF and the universal, standardized propaganda, is undoubtedly an impulsive and make choices, without much market research. In my opinion, the popularization of the reference to himself placed in the following disadvantages: 1, encountered direct competition, there is no leeway. Just think, in the client’s position in the price of the same circumstances, the learned UFIDA engaged in the promotion of standardization and popularization; and Kingdee has been claimed to be ‘personalized’, then the customer will be more inclined to