船舶承租人海事赔偿责任限制权利初探--兼评quot;The CMA Djakartaquot;轮案.pdfVIP

第 23 笔在第 4 JVl Vol. 23. Nο.4 河北法学 2005 年 4 月 Hebei La咀} Scimce Aþr. .2005 船舶承租人海事赔偿责任限制权利初探 一一兼评The CMA Djakarta轮棠 邬先江 (宁波海事法院，浙江宁波 315041) 摘 要在: 1976 年《海事赔偿资低限制公约》将船舶承租人归入自由舶所有人，赋予资任限制权利。但是公约米明确规定承狈 人的泡附和可限制!Jt任的索赔。海尊H司法实践中，指望耳运用适当的法律解释方法，析明公约规定的含义、正确裁 判.以实现公约目的。通过解释，公约规定的承租人应当笼光船承租人、湖租承租人和航次承租人等的统称。船 舶所有人遭受的直接财产损失不是可限制责任的索赔.船舶承租人无权对此限制责任。船航所有人提出的船载 货物损害迫偿索赔，承注目人仍有权限制宣言任。我倒《海商法》的相关规定应当作相|司解释与王理解Q 关键词:资任限制;船舶承租人;可限制资任的索赔 中固分类号: DF414 文章编号: 1002翩 3933(2005 )04-0083蝇。7 文献栋i只码 :A Right of Limitation of the Liability of Charterers 一-Witb Comments on tbeCMA DjakartaCase WU Xian-jiang (Ningbo M盯itime Court , Ningbo 315041 China) Abstract:The Convention on Limìtatìon of Liabìlity for Marìtime Claìms , 1976 , incorporates the charterer into the shipowner , granting a right to limit hìs liabìlìtiy. Howevcr. there is no clear stipulation , in the convention , on the 阳)pe of the charterer and the c1 aìms subject to his limitation. Thcrefore , in judìcial practice , it is nece四ary to apply proper interpretatíon methods tO ascertain the meaning of certaín stipulatio阳， to pursue just judgments , to realìze the object and purpose of thc convention. According to ínterprct的ions. the wordchartcrerin the C{)nvention shall be deemed to be a combination of b