诉讼时效期间立法模式之我见.pdfVIP

第 26 卷第 3 期 Vol.26. No.3 河北法学 2008 年 3 月 Hebei Law Science Mar. .2008 诉讼时效期间立法模式之我见 李 35 (上海政法学院法律系，上海 201701) 摘 要:各阁关于诉讼时效期间制度;E要有支观主义和客观烹义两种立法例，通过对中国和德国游讼时效改革的比较法 研究，提出诉讼时效期间制度因各阂所采用的不同的立法例而有所不同，囚l比不Jii.割裂不同立法例而论其低级的 观点。夜~代社会，诉讼时效期间制度采用主观主义立法例存在明报的优势，应为我阂未来诉讼时效期间立法所 集椅，并在此基础上，对我倒现行诉讼时效制度予以究番。 关键诩:民事权利;诉讼时效;民法通则;德~债法 中阁分类寄: DFïl X献标识码:A 文.编号: 1002-3933(2008)03-0148-06 OnLaw唰 enacting Forms of Extinctive Prescription LI Rui (Law Departrnent.Shanghai College of PolìticaJ Scienee and Law.Shanghaí 201701 China) Abstraet:Tbere are two Iaw-enacting forn回阳lcemíng the ternl of extinctive prescription. namely. the objectivism and 8ubjectivism. Througb theoretíc di配四脚nofth棚two fOmlS and a comparative study of the adoptiOll of th四e formsin varioω ∞untri饵. wjth a particular {oçus on the Iaw of PRC and the Gerntan reCornl of the extinctive 阴阳ription. the author believes that the systerns of extinctive pr酬riptíon 脚印g varioU$∞，un时es diff位 due ωthe adoption of these dífferent Iaw-enacting form.s. Mor，帕ver. it ÍlI not proper to discu拥 the different per阳iic length of the ternl of extinctive pr耐ription in va悦。回 countri明 regardle捕。f the Iaw-enacting (orms they adopted. Furthcr. it is advantageous to adopt the subjectivism for tbe ternl of extinctive prescription ín modem !!OCiety. Such law.enactíng form shall be insisted on by our ∞untry and used 础 the basÎs for future reform of theαtinctive prescription of our ∞untry. Key w睛也: