权利结构——对霍菲尔德权利理论的分析和改造.docxVIP

权利结构——对霍菲尔德权利理论的分析和改造.docx

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
Abstract “Right” is a fundamentally legal conception in the law and the most frequentin the legal terminology. But, it is often used inadequately and ambiguously.Hohfeld thought that the meanings of “rights” and “duties” are ambiguous. Itis widely accepted that the essence of all legal relations may be reduced to“rights” and “duties”, which could not discriminate a variety of complicatedlylegal relations. As the terminology of “rights” is used in different cases, they areactually indicated to divergent legal concepts.This article analyses four double fundamental legal conceptions separately,which are Hohfeld’ fundamental legal conceptionsthe lowest commondenominators, by means of semantic analysis and psychology, and are simplifiedto three double fundamentally legal conceptions, and make the conceptions of“rights” clear, and reveal various relations of concepts, and points out workingprocess of rights, and puts forward a new right structure model, and applies theright structure model to analyses differentiation of real rights and creditors rights,and raises a new differentiation of rights of property.Chapter of this article reviews the interpretation methods of two kinds ofrights: interpretation of essentialism and interpretation of positivism. Croduces the theory of Hohfeld’ right analysis. Chapter analyses four doublefundamentally legal conceptions separately by means of semantic analysis andpsychology, and compares with related conceptions, and indicates its unreasonableaspect, and finds out the wrong psychological roots by means of psychology.Chapter reveals relations of the different conceptions related to rights andpoints out the standard of differentiation, and puts forward a new right analysistheory, and sets up right structure model. Finally, this article analyses conceptionof real rights and creditors rights according to right structure model, and putforward the new standard of differentiation.Key words: rightsHohfeldsemantic analysisstructure引言权利是一个在法律语言中

文档评论(0)

lh2468lh + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档