论司法鉴定人出庭作证.pdfVIP

/‘年j Apr.，2脱)8 四川警察学院学银 ~棚牛 4 月 第 20 卷第2 期 川川州叫of Sichuan PQli~ ColJ咿， Vo1.20No.2 φ法学论坛 论司法昼反入出庭T乍证 。孟勤 (西南政栋大学肇庆 400031) 内辑摘要:我国的三大诉讼法和仲裁法皆把司法鉴定结论作为法定证据，鉴定人是鉴定结 论产生的主体，必然受到诉讼制皮和证据制度的规范，而具有一定的法律地位和责任。在我国 当前的诉讼模式下，诉讼证据依靠两个屏障加以过滤:其一，当事人、鉴定人出庭质证在与诉 讼;其二，由法官的采惧、法官的内心确信而形成。所以鉴定人出庭出具作为证据的司法鉴定结 论，接受当事人的质询和法官的询问，这是鉴定程序的最后阶段，也是鉴定结论能否升华为诉 恰证据的关键所在，直接影响法庭对鉴定结论的采怡。鉴于此，鉴定人出庭作证是十分必要和 必须进行舰范。当前，鉴定人出庭甚少，该制度常姿进行调整和克善。 关键词:司法公正;司法鉴定结论:司法鉴定人;法定证据;质询权 文章编号: 1009-841 0(2008)02南0008叩05 中图分类号:DF7 文献标识码:A On the judicial identifier appear in court as witness MENG Qin Abstract: Forensic verifications are deems as legal evidences in both ArbitrationLaw and three procedure laws in China.Forensic ex阴阳 who give 出eir expert conclusions are necessarily subject ωthe regulations conceming the procedure system and evidence system: therefore ,forensic ex阴阳 have their certain legal status and obligations.Under current litigation mode of our coun町， litigant evidences are subject to fiItration by two procedures.One is that parties and forensic ex刷 perts pa叫cipate in litigations by attending to 由e cou此 and-examining evidences: the other is the verifications and litigation evidences are evaluated d by the inner of judges. Therefore ,it is the last stage of procedure of verification for forensic experts to attend to the court and present their expert conclusions and to accept the interrogatory from both parties a