Discussion on how to develop students awareness of innovation in the junior high school chemistry teaching-毕业论文翻译.docVIP

Discussion on how to develop students’ awareness of innovation in the junior high school chemistry teaching According to the law of development of the creative growth of talent, as well as the requirements of contemporary society on the quality of talent, combined with the status quo of the current junior high school chemistry teaching, blending innovation awareness in junior high school chemistry teaching, to impart basic knowledge and skills and that students’ sense of innovation, innovation thinking, creative ability organically combined, each junior high school chemistry teachers need to explore the problem. First, create a relaxed atmosphere to cultivate the sense of innovation To create a relaxed atmosphere for teaching, is to create a natural, harmonious and equitable teaching and learning environment, in such an environment, conducive to eliminating the the prudish scene in the classroom, to shorten the emotional distance between students and teachers, help students personality development. In this atmosphere, the students’ courage to find the problem, the courage to ask questions, eager to solve the problem, their sense of innovation naturally training, for example, the reaction of acids and bases in the teaching process, he spoke of the and reactions using phenolphthalein as an indicator to determine the end of the reaction, a student, purple litmus and colorless phenolphthalein as indicator, and I think purple litmus addition to the alkali change, and in case of acid can also be changes in ability than the colorless phenol phthalocyanine large, purple litmus can not be determined in the end of the reaction? a proposed problem, the students were talking about, classroom suddenly become active again, I feel that this student has a strong sense of innovation, valuable and pregnant with the spirit of innovation, but limited to the pH color range of purple litmus understanding is not deep enough, so did not make a comprehensive judgment of thinking,