How to improve the ability of students to write argumentative Analysis-毕业论文翻译.docVIP

How to improve the ability of students to write argumentative Analysis Analysis capabilities, the ability to understand things, is the key to the success of writing argumentative. Students to write argumentative existence of a universal and more serious problem, is not good at analysis, resulting in articles or shallow understanding, or a loss, or the content of dry, or even the wrong point of view. Therefore, to improve the students to write argumentative level must train students to analyze the ability to explore the following talk about superficial views on several key aspects: A guidance trial title, the focus on cultural issues and the central theme to ask a few Why Trial a good question, in order to clear central argument to determine the scope and focus of discussion, which is the premise of the question in-depth analysis, which indicates the direction of the analysis of issues around cultural issues and the central theme of multi asked several why, will make writing ideas open, fully see the problem, and to deepen the thinking of this teachers guide the students’ compositions to encourage students to ask questions, and good at finding problems. high level of writing students are often the face of the text title are not good at problem and ask questions, so narrow thinking, am speechless, guidance, and encourage students to face the text title good at finding problems, ask questions is very necessary. Some students mentioned the problem may be superficial, indicating that they are the problem awareness is still in the superficial student to pull away, indicating that their thinking lacks the logical coherent only allow them to question, in order to identify problems and grasp this opportunity to put questions to key Department. I guide students to write lt;lt; ordinary with great gt;gt; and students together to study the following six questions to explore the ideas of the students. One, how do you understand the “great” and “ordinary” t